首页> 外文学位 >Collingwood on re-enactment: Understanding in history and interpretation in art (R. G. Collingwood).
【24h】

Collingwood on re-enactment: Understanding in history and interpretation in art (R. G. Collingwood).

机译:重演时的科林伍德:历史的理解和艺术的诠释(R. G.科林伍德)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this thesis, I aim at an interpretation of some central parts of the philosophy of R. G. Collingwood. My fundamental hypothesis is that in his writings in the philosophy of history and in the philosophy of art, Collingwood developed a general theory of understanding. This theory, which is based on his views on mind and language, is meant to apply to both cases: the understanding of actions of historical agents, or re-enactment, and the interpretation of the work of art.; In chapter 1, I present, after some biographical remarks, some of the intellectual sources of Collingwood. My main thesis is that Collingwood retained one element essential to the epistemology of his Oxford predecessors, idealists and realists alike, namely their opposition to subjective idealism. This is the origin of what I have called Collingwood's objectivism.; In chapter 2, I examine Collingwood's philosophy of mind, which forms the basis of his general theory. I show that it is not at all obsolete, as he anticipated Ryle's well-known critique of Cartesian dualism and he moved gradually to a full linguistic philosophy, not far from Wittgenstein's.; In chapter 3, I examine Collingwood's notion of re-enactment in the philosophy of history. I show that it is not to be understood as a psychological notion, akin to either Croce's intuizione or Dilthey's Verstehen . I also show that, according to Collingwood, in re-enactment it is the literally same thought that is grasped by the historian, not a copy of it. This objectivist element is a distinguishing feature of Collingwood's theory of understanding. Furthermore, I argue that Collingwood develops an anti-realist epistemology, which blends this objectivism with an ontological realism, while rejecting a strong conception of historical truth, which would transcend available evidence.; In chapter 4, after a careful definition of the terms, I argue that Collingwood's position amounts to a minimal form of historicism and relativism. I reject the so-called “radical conversion” hypothesis.; In chapter 5, I examine Collingwood's aesthetic theory and philosophy of art. I argue that it differs in essential ways from Croce's, it is not a form of ‘ideal theory’. I also show that Collingwood argues for objectivity in art by extending his remarks about understanding in language to the interpretation of the work of art. He thus allows for the sharing of the emotions expressed by the artist. I finally point out that this sharing of emotions by the artist and the audience is at the basis of Collingwood's anti-individualistic philosophy of art, whose central claim is that art is the community's struggle against the corruption of consciousness.; In the conclusion, I situate Collingwood's theory of understand within the current panorama, half way between the post-Quinean analytic philosophers, whose naturalism he rejects, and the continental philosophers, whose relativism he also rejects.
机译:在本文中,我旨在解释R. G. Collingwood哲学的一些核心部分。我的基本假设是,科林伍德在其历史哲学和艺术哲学著作中发展了一种普遍的理解理论。这种理论基于他对思想和语言的看法,旨在适用于两种情况:对历史主体的行为的理解或重演,以及对艺术品的解释。在第一章中,我经过一些传记性介绍之后,介绍了科林伍德的一些知识来源。我的主要论点是,科林伍德保留了他的牛津前辈,唯心主义者和现实主义者的认识论必不可少的要素,即他们对主观唯心主义的反对。这就是我所谓的科林伍德的 objectivism 的起源。在第二章中,我研究了科林伍德的思维哲学,这构成了他的一般理论的基础。我表明这还不是完全过时的,因为他期待着赖尔对笛卡尔二元论的著名批评,并且他逐渐转向一种完整的语言哲学,距离维特根斯坦不远。在第3章中,我研究了科林伍德关于历史哲学的重演概念。我表明,这不应被理解为类似于Croce的 intuizione 或Dilthey的 Verstehen 的心理概念。根据科林伍德的说法,我还表明,在重新制定时,历史学家抓住的是字面上的相同思想,而不是它的副本。客观主义元素是科林伍德理解理论的一个显着特征。此外,我认为科林伍德发展了一种反现实主义的认识论,它将这种客观主义与本体论现实主义相结合,同时又拒绝了对历史真理的强烈理解,而这种观念会超越现有的证据。在第4章中,对术语进行了仔细的定义之后,我认为科林伍德的立场相当于历史主义和相对主义的最小形式。我拒绝所谓的“激进转换”假说。在第5章中,我研究了科林伍德的美学理论和艺术哲学。我认为它与Croce的本质上有所不同,它不是“理想理论”的一种形式。我还表明,科林伍德通过将他对语言理解的论述扩展到对艺术作品的诠释来主张艺术的客观性。因此,他允许分享艺术家表达的情感。我最后指出,艺术家和观众之间的情感共享是科林伍德反个人主义艺术哲学的基础,他的核心主张是艺术是社区与意识形态腐败作斗争。最后,我将科林伍德的理解理论置于当前全景图的中间,介于后奎纳分析哲学家(他拒绝了自然主义)和大陆哲学家(他也反对相对论)之间。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kobayashi, Chinatsu.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Ottawa (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Ottawa (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Fine Arts.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 287 p.
  • 总页数 287
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;艺术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号