首页> 外文学位 >Developing a new global poverty metric: Toward a pro-poor approach.
【24h】

Developing a new global poverty metric: Toward a pro-poor approach.

机译:制定新的全球贫困指标:迈向扶贫方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Poverty is an increasingly important subject in moral and political philosophy. The concept of poverty is conceived and measured in a variety of competing ways. This dissertation seeks to explore two related questions about poverty: how should we think about poverty, and how should it be measured? I will argue that there is no single definitively correct conception or metric of poverty. In order to determine how poverty should be conceived of and measured, we must engage in a methodological discussion to determine which values should be used to resolve existing debates over the measurement of poverty.In the first section I develop a methodological framework for analyzing poverty. I argue that poverty is an essentially contested concept and there are multiple plausible conceptions of poverty. Similarly, there are multiple plausible poverty metrics that can be and have been developed. I argue that poverty measurement has hitherto been treated as value-neutral, despite the inherently value-laden nature of developing poverty conceptions and metrics. Given the value-laden nature of the enterprise, I argue for an ameliorative approach to poverty analysis that is explicitly normative. I then argue that a global poverty metric should be maintained, and defend this claim against common objections.In the second section I examine five competing conceptions of poverty and their corresponding metrics. Using an ameliorative approach, I examine the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and highlight the values that underlie each approach. I also examine the presence of descriptivism in each approach to poverty measurement, and explain how an ameliorative approach might reform the use of these conceptions and metrics.In the third section, I argue that a new global poverty metric should be developed using an ameliorative, pro-poor approach. I examine one pro-poor method, participation, and show how it can serve the interests of the poor if certain limitations are recognized. I defend a pro-poor poverty metric against possible objections. Finally, I propose a set of values to inform the development of a pro-poor global poverty metric, and make some tentative recommendations for indicators that could be included in such a metric.
机译:在道德和政治哲学中,贫困是一个日益重要的主题。贫困的概念是通过各种竞争方式来构思和衡量的。本文旨在探讨与贫困相关的两个问题:我们应如何看待贫困,以及如何衡量贫困?我将争辩说,没有单一的绝对正确的贫困观念或度量标准。为了确定如何构思和衡量贫困,我们必须进行方法论讨论,以确定应使用哪些价值来解决有关贫困率测量的现有争论。在第一部分中,我建立了分析贫困的方法论框架。我认为,贫困是一个本质上存在争议的概念,并且存在多种合理的贫困概念。同样,有可能已经制定了多个合理的贫困指标。我认为,尽管发展中的贫困观念和衡量标准具有内在的价值承载性,但贫困衡量迄今被视为价值中立。考虑到企业的价值特征,我主张采用一种改良的贫困分析方法,该方法应明确规范。然后,我认为应该维护全球贫困指标,并捍卫这一主张不受普遍反对。在第二部分中,我研究了五个相互竞争的贫困概念及其相应的指标。我使用改良方法,考察了每种方法的优缺点,并强调了每种方法的基础价值。我还研究了每种衡量贫困的方法中都存在描述主义,并解释了改良方法如何改革这些概念和度量的使用。在第三部分中,我认为应该使用改良方法来开发新的全球贫困度量,扶贫方式。我研究了一种有利于穷人的方法,即参与,并说明了在意识到某些限制的情况下它如何为穷人的利益服务。我为反对穷人的贫困指标辩护。最后,我提出了一套价值观念,以帮助制定扶贫全球贫困指标,并对可能包含在该指标中的指标提出了一些初步建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wisor, Scott.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 299 p.
  • 总页数 299
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号