• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Coalitions, congressional-executive branch relations, and public opinion: A study of post-Cold War crisis management and the Persian Gulf crisis.
【24h】

Coalitions, congressional-executive branch relations, and public opinion: A study of post-Cold War crisis management and the Persian Gulf crisis.

机译：联盟，国会与行政部门的关系和公众舆论：冷战后危机管理和波斯湾危机的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The end of the Cold War has changed the international political system and this has changed the strategic landscape for the United States. Though a major threat has been removed, the new security environment has important implications for U.S, national security policy and military strategy. As the international system has changed from the bipolar international system of the Cold War, to a multi-polar system, so too have the types of international crises changed. Most post Cold War crises that the United States has faced, and will likely face in the future, are markedly different than those it dealt with between 1947 and 1989. In the post Cold War era, most crises will last weeks and months, focus on a specific region, and not threaten the survival of the United States. In addition, the end of the bipolar competition has also resulted in less alliance cohesion and no automatic response by U.S. allies to regional or indirect threats. As a result, there will be less consensus on how to respond, at home and abroad, to most post Cold War crises. This will make it more difficult for the President to develop and implement a successful crisis management strategy.; While there has been a great deal written on crises and crisis management, little attention has been paid to the differences between post Cold War and Cold War crises or how these differences influence how the crises are managed. To better understand post Cold War crises and post Cold War crisis management, the dissertation focuses on three factors—the impact of the international system on crises and crisis management, the powers of the President and Congress to develop and influence policy during crises, and how the structures of those branches of government affect the decision-making process. The isolation of these three factors provide a new perspective on crisis management.
机译：冷战的结束改变了国际政治体系，改变了美国的战略格局。尽管消除了主要威胁，但新的安全环境对美国，国家安全政策和军事战略具有重要意义。随着国际体系从冷战的两极国际体系转变为多极体系，国际危机的类型也发生了变化。美国面对的和将来可能面对的大多数危机与1947年至1989年之间发生的危机有明显不同。在冷战后的时代，大多数危机将持续数周和数月，重点是特定区域，并且不威胁美国的生存。此外，两极竞争的结束也导致联盟凝聚力降低，美国盟国也没有对区域或间接威胁作出自动反应。结果，关于如何应对国内外大多数冷战后危机的共识将减少。这将使总统更加难以制定和实施成功的危机管理策略。尽管有很多关于危机和危机管理的文章，但很少关注冷战后和冷战后危机之间的差异或这些差异如何影响危机的处理。为了更好地理解冷战后的危机和冷战后的危机管理，本文着重于三个因素：国际体系对危机和危机管理的影响，总统和国会在危机期间制定和影响政策的权力以及如何这些政府部门的结构会影响决策过程。这三个因素的隔离为危机管理提供了新的视角。

著录项

  • 作者

    Glancy, David Arthur.;

  • 作者单位

    Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University).;

  • 授予单位 Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy (Tufts University).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 492 p.
  • 总页数 492
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号