• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Peasant rebellions in the age of globalization: The EZLN in Mexico and the PKK in Turkey.
【24h】

Peasant rebellions in the age of globalization: The EZLN in Mexico and the PKK in Turkey.

机译：全球化时代的农民起义：墨西哥的EZLN和土耳其的库尔德工人党。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The formerly corporatist/populist states of Mexico and Turkey have faced significant armed peasant-based insurgencies in their post-1980 period of neoliberal reforms. The Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN) in Chiapas, Mexico and the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) in Turkey's southeast serve as ideal case studies in order to deal with long unresolved questions in the literature on peasant rebellions: What is the role of greater capitalist penetration in the growth of these movements? Which peasants are the ones joining these movements? What role do political and militant organizations play in the process of mobilization?;Although the literature suggests that there is a correlation between peripheral states/regions and revolutionary movements, this project seeks to make those links more explicit by taking a process-oriented approach to how regions become peripheral and how revolutionary movements emerge. In doing so, I argue that Mexico and Turkey, with respect to the regions in focus, evince a distinct pattern of state building in comparison to European models.;The exercise of state power in Chiapas and Turkish Kurdistan has taken on institutionalized patterns. These patterns serve as a backdrop for understanding the ways different kinds of villages have been affected by state power. A basic typology of villages was established in terms of their relationship to the commercial economy, its social structure, and nature of social life. Stories of people who participated in, supported, or witnessed both insurgencies were collected. A small database of PKK insurgents was also created.;Together the data indicate that capitalist expansion did not play a primary or direct role in the formation of these insurgencies. Rather, villages where commercial agriculture had not come to dominate were the ones who participated. Such villages also had greater social-class diversity, contributing participants who were mobilized in varied ways. They responded to increasing land tensions, to greater repression from the state and its local allies, and to greater involvement in national politics in the form of leftist organizations building networks in local sites. The EZLN and the PKK were effective at linking themselves to these pre-existing networks. In doing so they built an elaborate organizational capacity.
机译：墨西哥和土耳其以前是社团主义/民粹主义国家，在1980年后的新自由主义改革时期曾面临基于武装农民的大规模叛乱。墨西哥东南部的Zapatista民族解放军（EZLN）和土耳其东南部的库尔德工人党（PKK）是理想的案例研究，目的是解决关于农民起义的文献中长期未解决的问题：在这些运动的增长中更大的资本主义渗透？参加这些运动的是哪些农民？政治和好战组织在动员过程中起什么作用？；尽管文献表明外围国家/地区与革命运动之间存在关联，但该项目试图通过采取以过程为导向的方法来使这些联系更加明确。区域如何成为外围以及革命运动如何出现。在此过程中，我认为相对于欧洲模式，墨西哥和土耳其在关注的地区表现出独特的国家建设模式。恰帕斯州和土耳其库尔德斯坦行使国家权力采取了制度化模式。这些模式为理解不同种类的村庄受到国家权力影响的方式提供了背景。根据村庄与商业经济的关系，社会结构和社会生活性质，建立了村庄的基本类型。收集了参与，支持或目睹这两种叛乱的人的故事。还创建了一个小规模的库尔德工人党叛乱分子数据库。总体而言，这些数据表明，资本主义扩张在这些叛乱的形成中没有发挥主要作用或直接作用。相反，没有商业农业占主导地位的村庄就是那些参与其中的村庄。这样的村庄也具有更大的社会阶层多样性，以各种方式动员了参与者。他们对日益加剧的土地紧张局势，对国家及其地方盟友的更大镇压以及对左派组织在当地站点建立网络的形式对国家政治的更大参与做出了回应。 EZLN和PKK有效地将自己链接到这些现有网络。为此，他们建立了完善的组织能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kucukozer, Mehmet.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Relations.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 310 p.
  • 总页数 310
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号