首页> 外文学位 >Horizontal budgeting: Results-based budgeting and the co-ordination of horizontal policies in Canada and the United States.
【24h】

Horizontal budgeting: Results-based budgeting and the co-ordination of horizontal policies in Canada and the United States.

机译:横向预算:加拿大和美国的基于结果的预算和横向政策的协调。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines how governments may use results-based budgeting to co-ordinate horizontal policies, and how a country's regime type may affect the incidence and success of such efforts. A rational choice institutional approach is used to frame the relations between "guardian" budget-makers in central budget agencies and "spender" civil servants in line departments. We undertake a quantitative analysis of primary budget documents of selected departments in the federal governments of Canada and the United States, and confirm our findings through a series of interviews with budget-makers, departmental officials and academics in both countries.; Our findings suggest that, regardless of regime type, results-based budgeting is rarely used to help co-ordinate horizontal policies, for two main reasons. First, results-based budgeting's potential to co-ordinate is limited by methodological difficulties. In particular, it is often difficult to fully understand the causal theory behind programs and to fully measure all the relevant aspects of programs. Second, the motivation of budget-makers to so use results-based budgeting is limited by political disincentives. In particular, there are many disincentives to publicize the true objectives of programs and to reveal the actual performance of programs. On balance, the theoretical potential of and incentives to adopt "horizontal budgeting" is often outweighed by the practical difficulties and disincentives.; This research contributes to existing knowledge of the public administration of expenditure budget-making by highlighting similarities between current budgeting systems in Canada and the U.S. and the program budgeting experiments of the 1960s and 1970s, by exploring the potential and incentives to use results-based budgeting to coordinate horizontal policies, and by advancing the research methodology of comparative budgeting studies. Furthermore, by increasing our knowledge of the process of budgeting, we also inform understandings of the contents of budgets, and so inform understandings of the contents of a wide range of policies and programs.
机译:本文研究了政府如何使用基于结果的预算来协调横向政策,以及一个国家的政权类型如何影响这种努力的发生和成功。理性选择制度方法用于构架中央预算机构的“监护人”预算制定者与直属部门的“支出者”公务员之间的关系。我们对加拿大和美国联邦政府某些部门的主要预算文件进行了定量分析,并通过与两国预算制定者,部门官员和学者的一系列访谈来证实我们的发现。我们的发现表明,无论哪种政体类型,基于结果的预算很少用于帮助协调横向政策,这有两个主要原因。首先,基于结果的预算编制的协调潜力受到方法论难题的限制。特别是,通常很难完全理解程序背后的因果理论,并且很难全面衡量程序的所有相关方面。其次,预算制定者使用基于结果的预算的动机受到政治上的限制。特别是,有许多不利因素来宣传计划的真实目标和揭示计划的实际绩效。总而言之,实践中的困难和不利因素常常超过采用“水平预算”的理论潜力和动机。这项研究通过强调使用基于结果的预算的潜力和动机,着重强调了加拿大和美国当前的预算体系与1960年代和1970年代的计划预算实验之间的相似性,从而有助于对支出预算的公共管理进行现有的了解。协调横向政策,并推进比较预算研究的研究方法。此外,通过增加对预算过程的了解,我们还可以增进对预算内容的了解,从而使人们了解各种政策和计划的内容。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dewar, David I.;

  • 作者单位

    McMaster University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McMaster University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 314 p.
  • 总页数 314
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号