• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The challenges facing the international criminal justice regarding fair trial standards: The example of the ICTR.
【24h】

The challenges facing the international criminal justice regarding fair trial standards: The example of the ICTR.

机译：国际刑事司法在公平审判标准方面面临的挑战：卢旺达问题国际法庭的例子。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Forty seven years after the Nuremberg Tribunal, the world began in the 1990's another experience of international criminal justice with the UN ad hoc Tribunals, conceived as subsidiary bodies of the Security Council. This new experience led to the creation of a permanent International Criminal Court (ICC). Unfortunately, the multiple flaws characterizing the proceedings of these ad hoc Tribunals which prevented the ICTR from reaching its objectives of peace and reconciliation through justice in Rwanda, the excessive flexibility of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of these new judicial bodies, as well as the disruptive political interferences, do not help the newly born judicial system acquire the worldwide recognition it normally needs for its full efficiency.;To gain the legitimacy necessary for a system that is envisioned as a mean to help deter human rights violations, and provide the best examples for domestic justice, particularly in countries notorious for their disrespect for the rules of law, it is mandatory to identify all the problems tainting the fairness of its proceedings and fix them for good.;These are the objectives of this dissertation, pursued through a detailed analysis of the ICTR proceedings, done without complacency. The main difficulty of this process is the inability of analysts to focus on the current shortfalls in the midst of the euphoria created by this long-awaited judicial system. As a result, the analysis of this dissertation may seem at odd with the general perception of this nascent judicial system, hailed for its intended ability to end the vicious cycle of human rights violation and impunity. However, the innovative character of the process conducted through this dissertation is certainly the only serious way for the international criminal justice to eschew the negative image and crippling criticisms that could permanently undermine its vital importance and noble objectives.
机译：纽伦堡法庭成立四十七年后，世界开始了1990年代联合国特设法庭的另一次国际刑事司法经历。联合国特设法庭是安全理事会的附属机构。这种新的经验导致建立了常设国际刑事法院（ICC）。不幸的是，这些特设法庭的诉讼程序存在多种缺陷，阻碍了卢旺达问题国际法庭通过卢旺达的司法实现其和平与和解的目标，这些新司法机构的《议事规则》和《证据规则》过分灵活破坏性的政治干预，不能帮助新生的司法系统获得通常需要的全面的正常运作才能获得全世界的认可。；要获得必要的合法性，该系统被认为是有助于遏制侵犯人权并提供最佳解决方案的手段国内司法的例子，特别是在因不遵守法律规则而臭名昭著的国家中，必须找出所有阻碍其程序公正性的问题并永久加以解决。这些是本论文的目标，通过对卢旺达问题国际法庭的程序进行了详细的分析，但没有自满。这个过程的主要困难是，在期待已久的司法系统所产生的欣快感中，分析人员无法专注于当前的不足。结果，对本论文的分析似乎与这种新生的司法系统的普遍理解不一致，它被认为具有结束人权侵犯和有罪不罚恶性循环的预期能力。但是，通过本论文进行的程序的创新性无疑是国际刑事司法规避负面形象和破坏性批评的唯一严肃方法，这可能会永久损害其至关重要的意义和崇高的目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Degli, Jean Yaovi.;

  • 作者单位

    The American University.;

  • 授予单位 The American University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 1177 p.
  • 总页数 1177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号