首页> 外文学位 >Self-making, class struggle and labor autarky: The political origins of private entrepreneurship in Vietnam and China.
【24h】

Self-making, class struggle and labor autarky: The political origins of private entrepreneurship in Vietnam and China.

机译:自我创造,阶级斗争和劳动自给自足:越南和中国的私人企业家精神的政治渊源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Socialist countries are unique in having claimed a moral monopoly over the proper use of factors of production and the legitimate ends of economic activity. Political scientists have consequently viewed informal or second economy activities as potentially subversive of socialist state institutions, yet largely without impact on subsequent patterns of economic organization and development. This dissertation challenges this claim and related accounts of market formation by uncovering the links between socialist state definitions of the role of class struggle in development and post-socialist outcomes. In so doing, it offers an alternative explanation for why China's private sector is booming and Vietnam's is lagging today.; The dissertation shows that differences in socialist state strategies of economic management and political mobilization led to the creation of distinct kinds of sub-national threats to state allocative and economic authority in Vietnam and China. These threats, I argue, were not mere economic responses to shortage. They were fundamental moral challenges to state redistributive norms that led not only to speculation in the economy but also to struggles over the normative order in which wealth was created.; To explain how these challenges gave rise to different patterns of market formation, I examine the relationship between state definitions of the role of class struggle in socialist development and the evolution of norms of informal economic cooperation. I show that these norms arose not from resource dependency or economic shortage, but from how actors perceived each other, themselves and their interests.; Society, in other words, played a role in the construction of class as a unique institution in socialism and thus in the meaning and contours of private entrepreneurship. I show how this dynamic brought different sets of actors and mindsets to the forefront on each country's marketplace. In so doing, I explain why economic, social and political exclusion in socialist China proved richer soil for the articulation and expansion of market interests and market development than did the pervasive expression of economic unorthodoxy in socialist Vietnam.; The dissertation is based on three years of archival, documentary and field research in northern Vietnam and Sichuan Province, China.
机译:社会主义国家的独特之处在于,他们声称对生产要素的正确使用和经济活动的合法目的进行了道义上的垄断。因此,政治学家认为非正式或第二经济活动可能颠覆社会主义国家机构,但在很大程度上不会影响随后的经济组织和发展方式。本文通过揭示社会主义国家关于阶级斗争在发展中的作用的定义与后社会主义成果之间的联系,对这一主张和有关市场形成的解释提出了挑战。这样,它为为什么中国的私营部门蓬勃发展而越南的今天滞后提供了另一种解释。论文表明,社会主义国家经济管理战略和政治动员战略的差异导致在越南和中国对国家分配和经济权威产生各种次国家威胁。我认为,这些威胁不仅仅是对短缺的经济反应。这是对国家再分配规范的根本性道德挑战,不仅导致经济投机,而且也为创造财富的规范顺序而斗争。为了解释这些挑战如何导致不同的市场形成模式,我研究了关于阶级斗争在社会主义发展中的作用的国家定义与非正式经济合作规范的演变之间的关系。我表明,这些准则不是源于对资源的依赖或经济短缺,而是源于行为者对彼此,自身和利益的看法。换句话说,社会在作为社会主义独特制度的阶级建设中发挥了作用,从而在私人企业家精神的意义和轮廓方面也发挥了作用。我将展示这种动态如何将不同的参与者和思维方式带入每个国家市场的最前沿。在这样做的时候,我解释了为什么社会主义中国的经济,社会和政治排斥为证明和扩大市场利益以及市场发展提供了比社会主义越南无所不在的经济正统表达更为丰富的土壤。本文基于越南北部和中国四川省三年的档案,文献和实地研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Abrami, Regina Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 p.3330
  • 总页数 499
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号