首页> 外文学位 >Predictive validity of MMPI-2 and Rorschach in the diagnosis of depression and schizophrenia.
【24h】

Predictive validity of MMPI-2 and Rorschach in the diagnosis of depression and schizophrenia.

机译:MMPI-2和Rorschach在抑郁症和精神分裂症诊断中的预测有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study investigated the psychodiagnostic abilities of and relationship between indicators of psychiatric disorders. Archival data from 146 adult psychiatric inpatient subjects were used to empirically validate the ability of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Indicator-II (MMPI-2) code types and Rorschach Inkblot Test indices to accurately classify subjects according to depressive and schizophrenic discharge diagnoses. The predictive or criterion validity of MMPI-2 code types and Rorschach indices were measured by logistic regression analyses, indicating statistical significance of each instrument's individual predictive validity, and the overall diagnostic classification rates, for the two types of diagnoses. The incremental validity of combining the instruments was assessed by hierarchical logistic regression to determine whether the predictive validity and diagnostic efficiency of MMPI-2 code types could be improved by adding Rorschach indices to predict diagnoses of depression and schizophrenia. Chi-square analyses evaluated the independence of the predictor variables to determine the degree of association of the MMPI-2 and Rorschach research instruments as they were used in this study.;Predictive validity results revealed that neither of the MMPI-2 code types investigated (2-7/7-2 for depression, and 8-6/6-8-(7) for schizophrenia) were found to be significant predictors of their respective discharge diagnoses. These code types also had poor diagnostic classification rates. The Rorschach index for depression (DEPI) also failed to demonstrate predictive validity and had a poor classification rate. Only the Rorschach index for schizophrenia (SCZI) was found to be a significant predictor of schizophrenic diagnoses and evidenced a relatively good rate of classification accuracy.;Further, only the Rorschach SCZI demonstrated significant incremental validity over its related MMPI-2 code type in enhancing accurate prediction of diagnosis and improving indices of diagnostic efficiency and classification rates. Finally, the MMPI-2 and Rorschach were found to lack significant correlation with each other, and instead were found to be statistically independent measures of psychopathology.;Limitations of the study include the use of archival data from an acute inpatient facility and its implications for external validity. Preliminary indications of the constructs measured by the two instruments is discussed, as are suggestions for future studies.
机译:这项研究调查了精神疾病的心理诊断能力以及指标之间的关系。使用来自146名成人精神病住院患者的档案数据来凭经验验证明尼苏达州多相性人格指示器II(MMPI-2)代码类型和Rorschach墨迹测验指数对抑郁症和精神分裂症出院诊断进行准确分类的能力。 MMPI-2代码类型和Rorschach指数的预测或标准有效性通过logistic回归分析进行了测量,表明每种仪器对两种诊断的单独预测有效性和总体诊断分类率的统计学意义。通过分层逻辑回归评估组合仪器的增量有效性,以确定通过添加Rorschach指数预测抑郁症和精神分裂症的诊断是否可以提高MMPI-2代码类型的预测有效性和诊断效率。卡方分析评估了预测变量的独立性,以确定了本研究中使用的MMPI-2和Rorschach研究工具的关联程度。;预测有效性结果表明,没有研究过MMPI-2代码类型(发现抑郁症的2-7 / 7-2和精神分裂症的8-6 / 6-8-(7)是其各自出院诊断的重要预测指标。这些代码类型的诊断分类率也很差。 Rorschach抑郁指数(DEPI)也未能证明可预测的有效性,并且分类率很低。发现只有Rorschach精神分裂症指数(SCZI)是精神分裂症诊断的重要预测指标,并且分类准确率相对较高。此外,只有Rorschach SCZI在相关的MMPI-2代码类型上显示出显着的增量有效性准确的诊断预测并提高诊断效率和分类率指标。最后,发现MMPI-2和Rorschach彼此之间没有显着相关性,而是被认为是统计上独立于精神病理学的指标。该研究的局限性包括使用来自急性住院设施的档案数据及其对患者的影响。外部有效性。讨论了通过两种仪器测量的构造物的初步迹象,以及对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morgan-Gillard, Shannon.;

  • 作者单位

    Seton Hall University, College of Education and Human Services.;

  • 授予单位 Seton Hall University, College of Education and Human Services.;
  • 学科 Clinical psychology.;Quantitative psychology.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号