• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Epistemic communities: Necessary or sufficient for environmental cooperation? An analysis of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea regions (Mancur Olson).
【24h】

Epistemic communities: Necessary or sufficient for environmental cooperation? An analysis of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea regions (Mancur Olson).

机译：认知社区：环境合作是必要还是充分？对黑海和里海地区的分析（曼库尔·奥尔森）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Why do environmental regimes form easily in some regions and not others? What roles do epistemic (scientific and stakeholder/activist) communities play in the process of regime formation? This study examines the factors influencing the formation of regional environmental agreements in the Black Sea and Caspian Sea regions. This study employs a qualitative comparative methodology to examine collective action problems of environmental cooperation through the lens of public choice theory, building on the work of Mancur Olson's bi-product theory (1965). The cases of the Black Sea and Caspian Environment Programmes provide illuminating empirical evidence of the varying roles of epistemic communities in the formation of regional environmental regimes. This study demonstrates that while epistemic communities play an advisory role, they are less influential than previously argued (P. Haas, 1990). Rather, this research demonstrates that the incentives to join regional environmental agreements in the Black Sea and Caspian regions are shaped by domestic policy-makers' anticipation of net economic gains for joining regional environmental cooperative agreements. This assertion is supported by a qualitative cost/benefit analysis of anticipated gains from environmental cooperation for domestic level policy makers in these regions. The assertions of this work challenges the academic assumptions that environmental cooperation occurs primarily because domestic policy makers are driven to sign international environmental agreements by active domestic forces concerned with improving environmental stewardship.
机译：为什么在某些地区而不是其他地区容易形成环境制度？知识（科学和利益相关者/活动家）社区在政权形成过程中扮演什么角色？本研究探讨了影响黑海和里海地区区域环境协议形成的因素。这项研究在Mancur Olson的双产品理论（1965）的基础上，采用定性的比较方法，通过公共选择理论的角度考察了环境合作的集体行动问题。黑海和里海环境计划的案例提供了有启发性的经验证据，说明了认知社区在区域环境制度形成中的不同作用。这项研究表明，尽管认知社区发挥了咨询作用，但它们的影响力却比以前所争论的要小（P. Haas，1990）。相反，这项研究表明，加入黑海和里海地区的区域环境协议的动机是由国内政策制定者对加入区域环境合作协议的净经济收益的预期所决定的。对这些地区的国内政策制定者从环境合作中获得的预期收益进行定性成本/收益分析，从而支持了这一观点。这项工作的主张挑战了有关环境合作发生的学术假设，这主要是因为国内决策者被关注改善环境管理的积极国内力量驱使签署国际环境协定。

著录项

  • 作者

    Matthews, Mary M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Georgia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Georgia.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 276 p.
  • 总页数 276
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;环境科学基础理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号