In order to assess the purpose and function of the incest narratives in the Pentateuch and the incest prohibitions of Leviticus 18, the following examination constitutes a formal analysis of ancient Israelite kinship terminology. According to anthropologists, only through a formal analysis of kin terms can incest prohibitions be properly understood. A "formal" analysis of kinship terms is a method employed by ethnographers to compare the kinship system of any given society with one of the six conventionally recognized kinship systems worldwide.;There are very specific culturally patterned and expected behaviors that every society adopts in relation to post-marital residence, rules of descent, kinship terminology and incest prohibitions. These patterns are socially conditioned and eventually produce either of the six kinship systems. A close reading of the biblical textual evidence in light of Syro-palestinian archaeology allows us to conclude that the kinship system of ancient Israel was Normal Hawaiian. Furthermore, the internal logic and structure of Leviticus 18 becomes clear once we recognize that descent is not biological but jural in nature. Reading Leviticus 18 with this knowledge in view, we find that a Normal Hawaiian kinship system is reflected in both the Genesis incest narratives and the jural-legal form of Leviticus 18. A hierarchy of kinship becomes transparent in Leviticus 18 and allows us to see, among other things, that there is indeed an explicit daughter prohibition.
展开▼
