首页> 外文学位 >The retrieval processes that underlie remembering and knowing in recognition memory.
【24h】

The retrieval processes that underlie remembering and knowing in recognition memory.

机译:识别记忆中的记忆和记忆基础的检索过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A great deal of interest has focused on the use of Tulving's (1985) Remember-Know procedure as a means to study the subjective experience that accompanies memory retrieval. Theorists commonly assume that the experiential states of Remembering and Knowing measured by this procedure are direct manifestations of two underlying retrieval processes, recollection and familiarity. This assumption was put to empirical test. The recollective and familiarity processes were characterized by means of empirical findings and formal models taken from the wider memory literature. Based on this, predictions were made for the hit rate patterns of Remember and Know responses following associative and old-new recognition in three paradigrns: associative interference, part-set cueing, and retrieval practice. In Experiments 1--3, increasing the number of study-list items similar to a test probe (associative interference) decreased Remember hits and increased Know hits. In Experiment 4, cueing a test probe with similar items (part-set cueing) decreased Remember hits and increased Know hits. In Experiment 5, cued-recall of items belonging to a semantic category (retrieval practice) decreased Remember hits and marginally increased Know hits for unpracticed members of that category relative to baseline. These findings are consistent with the idea that Remember and Know states are directly related to the underlying retrieval processes of recollection and familiarity.
机译:人们非常关注Tulving(1985)的“记住-知道”过程的使用,以此作为研究伴随记忆检索的主观经验的一种手段。理论家通常认为,通过此过程测得的“记住”和“知道”的体验状态是两个基础检索过程(回忆和熟悉)的直接体现。对该假设进行了实证检验。回忆和熟悉过程的特征在于经验发现和从更广泛的记忆文献中获得的形式化模型。在此基础上,针对联想和新旧识别三个方面的联想和新旧认知,对“记住”和“知道”响应的命中率模式进行了预测:联想干扰,零件集提示和检索实践。在实验1--3中,增加类似于测试探针(联想干扰)的研究列表项的数量会减少“记住”命中率并增加“知道”命中率。在实验4中,提示具有相似项目的测试探针(零件提示)会降低“记住”命中率,并会增加“知道”命中率。在实验5中,暗示检索属于语义类别的项目(检索实践)相对于基线而言,该类别的未练习成员的“记住”命中次数有所降低,而“知识”命中率略有增加。这些发现与“记住”和“知道”状态与潜在的回忆和熟悉程度的检索过程直接相关的想法是一致的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Verde, Michael F.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Cognitive psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号