• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Comparative Case Study Analysis of Combustible Dust Explosions: Determining the Need for an OSHA Combustible Dust Standard.
【24h】

Comparative Case Study Analysis of Combustible Dust Explosions: Determining the Need for an OSHA Combustible Dust Standard.

机译：可燃粉尘爆炸的比较案例研究分析：确定对OSHA可燃粉尘标准的需求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examined the hazards associated with combustible dust, the need for an OSHA standard to assist in the prevention of combustible dust explosions, and the influence such a standard would have on employers in industries where combustible dust is used. The framework of this study was to compare and evaluate the performance of two companies that experienced a combustible dust explosion. Past Kentucky Occupational Safety and Health (KYOSH) inspection history was reviewed as well as all data collected prior to and after the explosions. The following information was reviewed: OSHA industry standards, OSHA Compliance Directives, NFPA codes and standards, additional consensus standards, and peer-reviewed journal articles. This study found that the most effective method of preventing a combustible dust explosion is implementing a combustible dust management program including emphasis on housekeeping and management of change. An OSHA combustible dust General Industry Standard would provide the knowledge and additional motivation to implement the necessary mitigation procedures to prevent a combustible dust explosion. However, it would be difficult to develop one single standard to cover combustible dust in every industry. One solution is that industries that are covered by additional industry consensus standards be exempt from the standard. An example would be a woodworking facility that is covered by NFPA 664, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities. Special care would have to be taken by OSHA with regard to how combustible dust is defined, if the standard is performance-based or specification-based, small versus large businesses, and economic concerns.
机译：这项研究检查了与可燃粉尘相关的危害，需要OSHA标准以帮助防止可燃粉尘爆炸以及该标准对使用可燃粉尘行业的雇主的影响。本研究的框架是比较和评估经历可燃粉尘爆炸的两家公司的绩效。回顾了过去的肯塔基州职业安全与卫生（KYOSH）的检查历史，以及爆炸前后的所有数据。审查了以下信息：OSHA行业标准，OSHA合规性指令，NFPA准则和标准，其他共识性标准以及同行评审的期刊文章。这项研究发现，预防可燃粉尘爆炸的最有效方法是实施可燃粉尘管理计划，其中包括强调内部管理和变更管理。 OSHA可燃粉尘通用行业标准将提供知识和其他动力来实施必要的缓解程序，以防止可燃粉尘爆炸。但是，很难在每个行业中制定一个单一的标准来覆盖可燃粉尘。一种解决方案是，将其他行业共识标准所涵盖的行业排除在该标准之外。例如，NFPA 664所涵盖的木工设施，《木材加工和木工设施中的火灾和爆炸预防标准》。如果标准是基于性能或基于规范，小型企业与大型企业以及经济方面的考虑，OSHA必须特别注意如何定义可燃粉尘。

著录项

  • 作者

    McKee, Johnna.;

  • 作者单位

    Eastern Kentucky University.;

  • 授予单位 Eastern Kentucky University.;
  • 学科 Occupational safety.;Environmental health.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 108 p.
  • 总页数 108
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号