• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Arenas of social movement outcomes: Accounting for political, cultural, and social outcomes of three land-use social movements.
【24h】

Arenas of social movement outcomes: Accounting for political, cultural, and social outcomes of three land-use social movements.

机译：社会运动成果领域：解释三种土地利用社会运动的政治，文化和社会成果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The study of social movement outcomes has started to resurface within social movement literature. This resurfacing of the study of the ultimate dependent variable has led to a stronger conceptualization of outcomes as well as better measures of outcomes. In this dissertation, I offer suggestions for how to further strengthen the conceptualization and operationalization of social movement outcomes by providing an analytical framework that views social movement outcomes as three overlapping arenas: political, cultural, and social. I use three cases of smart growth social movements to demonstrate the usefulness of the framework for the study of social movement outcomes. Following a recent program of study within social movement outcomes, the data is analyzed using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Ragin 1987). By conceptualizing these arenas as overlapping and influencing one another, social movement outcomes are not seen as occurring all at once at one point in time nor are they seen as resulting in a categorical outcome of success or failure. This conceptualization allows researchers to examine a multitude of outcomes, which will help at parsing apart how some causal factors relate to specific arenas of outcomes. Furthermore, this conceptual framework also offers insight into how gains in one arena may help or hinder gains in another arena.
机译：社会运动成果的研究已开始在社会运动文献中重新出现。最终因变量研究的重新铺装导致了更强有力的结果概念化以及更好的结果度量。在这篇论文中，我为如何通过提供一个将社会运动成果视为三个重叠领域（政治，文化和社会）的分析框架，进一步加强社会运动成果的概念化和可操作性提供了建议。我使用三种智能增长社会运动案例来证明该框架对于研究社会运动结果的有用性。根据最近关于社会运动结果的研究计划，使用定性比较分析（Ragin 1987）对数据进行了分析。通过将这些领域概念化为重叠并相互影响，就不会将社交运动的结果视为在某个时间点同时发生，也不会将其视为成功或失败的绝对结果。这种概念化使研究人员可以检查多种结果，这将有助于解析某些因果因素如何与特定结果领域相关。此外，这一概念框架还提供了一个领域的收益如何有助于或阻碍另一个领域的收益的见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hofstedt, Brandon.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Sociology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 127 p.
  • 总页数 127
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号