• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >From sounds of wailing to songs of joy: A textual-rhetorical analysis of the Masoretic text and Septuagint of Zephaniah.
【24h】

From sounds of wailing to songs of joy: A textual-rhetorical analysis of the Masoretic text and Septuagint of Zephaniah.

机译：从哀号声到欢乐的歌声：对马索尔语经文和《西番雅书记》的文字修辞分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Masoretic and Septuagint traditions of the book of Zephaniah differ from each other in several places, both linguistically and structurally. The aim of this dissertation is to probe these two textual traditions of Zephaniah in order to present the differences between them descriptively, not prescriptively, and to read them in their larger literary contexts. The intent is not to establish one critical edition that disparages one tradition for the other but rather to discern how such differences yield the message of Zephaniah in the two distinct, though related, traditions, respecting the uniqueness each brings to the meaning of the book. This textual-rhetorical analysis is carried out in two steps.; The first step is an analysis of MT Zephaniah as preserved in the Tiberian witness of the Aleppo Codex. A text-critical analysis focuses on matters of grammar, syntax, and semantics, noting also the significantly different readings in the Leningrad Codex and the Cairo Codex of the Prophets, as well as in the pre-Masoretic texts of Zephaniah from the Judean Desert: 4QXII b, 4QXIIc, (2)MurXII (=Mur88). A rhetorical analysis of MT Zephaniah is then offered, borrowing salient features from the methodology of rhetorical criticism of the Hebrew Bible. The rhetorical analysis is not a thorough one but a supplement to the text-critical analysis that seeks to understand how the overall design of the book and its individual parts work together to convey its meaning and to read "uncertain" readings of the MT in their literary contexts.; The second step focuses on LXX Zephaniah, especially as it compares and contrasts with MT Zephaniah. This step involves a text-critical analysis and a rhetorical analysis of LXX Zephaniah, using the Gottingen critical edition as the text base. Significantly different readings in the Greek Minor Prophets Scroll from Nah&dotbelow;al H&dotbelow;ever (8H&dotbelow;evXIIgr) are also noted.
机译：西番雅书的Masoretic和Septuagint传统在语言和结构上都在几个地方彼此不同。本文旨在探讨西番雅这两个文本传统，以描述性地而非描述性地呈现二者之间的差异，并在其较大的文学语境中对其进行阅读。目的不是要建立一个使另一种传统贬低一种传统的批判版本，而是要辨别出这种差异如何在两种截然不同但相互关联的传统中产生西番雅的信息，同时尊重每一种都赋予了本书含义。文本修辞分析分两个步骤进行。第一步是分析阿勒颇法典的泰伯利亚见证中保存的MT Zephaniah。对文本的批判性分析着重于语法，语法和语义问题，还注意到先知的列宁格勒手抄本和开罗手抄本，以及来自犹大沙漠的西番雅书的前Masoretic文本中存在明显不同的读物： 4QXII b，4QXIIc，（2）MurXII（= Mur88）。然后提供了对MT Zephaniah的修辞分析，它借鉴了希伯来圣经修辞学批评方法的显着特征。修辞分析不是一种彻底的分析，而是对文本批判性分析的补充，后者旨在了解本书的整体设计及其各个部分如何协同工作以传达其含义并阅读MT的“不确定”读物。文学情境。第二步着眼于LXX Zephaniah，尤其是它与MT Zephaniah的对比。此步骤涉及对文本的批判性分析和对LXX Zephaniah的修辞分析，使用哥廷根批判版作为文本基础。在《希腊小先知卷轴》中，从Nah和al H曾经（8H evXIIgr）中也有明显不同的读数。

著录项

  • 作者

    Berneking, Steven W.;

  • 作者单位

    Union Theological Seminary.;

  • 授予单位 Union Theological Seminary.;
  • 学科 Religion Biblical Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 348 p.
  • 总页数 348
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 圣经;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号