首页> 外文学位 >A technological dis-ease: Scientific discourses, mass media, and the 'truths' about 'computer-addiction'.
【24h】

A technological dis-ease: Scientific discourses, mass media, and the 'truths' about 'computer-addiction'.

机译:技术上的麻烦:科学的话语,大众媒体以及关于“计算机成瘾”的“真相”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a case study into the historical emergence of psychological, medical and popular discourses surrounding contemporary conditions variously labeled “computer addiction,” “Internet Addiction Disorder,” (IAD) and “Pathological Computer Use” (PCU). Most research on computer addiction originates from within clinical psychology, psychiatry and the behavioral sciences, and works to prove the existence of the disorder, to locate its origins, and to identify personality types most “at risk” for computer addiction. By contrast, this study is conceptualized through historical and social studies of mass media, science, and technology. From this view, computer technologies and scientific discourses are historically situated and are implicated in a complex cluster of cultural, political and economic relationship. This study maps the conditions of possibility for the formation and legitimization of the concept of “computer addiction,” and explores the effects of this legitimacy. In short, the discourse on computer addiction is approached as an example of what Foucault (1978) calls a normalizing discourse—in this case, a discourse which functions contextually toward the production, definition, negotiation, and management of people's developing relationships with this new media technology even while it defines and produces related definitions of “appropriate” and “inappropriate,” or “normal” and “abnormal,” social practice (e.g. gender, family). Data for analysis include scholarly books, journals, media coverage, psychological diagnostic criteria, court transcripts, and on-line discussion group postings. Critical questions addressed in this study include: What are the parameters, utility, stakes, and material effects of “computer addiction”? What are the rhetorical and social processes through which these scientific claims are produced, negotiated, legitimized, and/or discounted? What are the gendered dimensions of computer addiction? It is concluded that the concept of “computer addiction” is not a purely scientific concept. Rather, the formation of the concept is socially produced and it has functioned historically as a mechanism by which society has defined, negotiated and managed the complex struggles through which computer technologies have been incorporated into and disrupted (contested) social organizations.
机译:这是对围绕当代条件的心理学,医学和流行语的历史兴起进行的案例研究,这些语种被分别标记为“计算机成瘾”,“互联网成瘾症”(IAD)和“病态计算机使用”(PCU)。大多数有关计算机成瘾的研究都起源于临床心理学,精神病学和行为科学,并致力于证明该疾病的存在,确定其起源并确定最容易受到计算机成瘾危害的人格类型。相比之下,本研究是通过对大众传媒,科学和技术的历史和社会研究来概念化的。从这种观点来看,计算机技术和科学话语具有历史悠久的地位,并且牵涉到复杂的文化,政治和经济关系集群中。这项研究描绘了“计算机成瘾”概念的形成和合法化的可能性条件,并探讨了这种合法性的影响。简而言之,以计算机成瘾的论述为例,以福柯(1978)所谓的规范化论述为例。媒体技术即使定义并产生了“适当的”和“不适当的”或“正常的”和“异常的”社会实践(例如性别,家庭)的相关定义。用于分析的数据包括学术书籍,期刊,媒体报道,心理诊断标准,法庭笔录和在线讨论组发帖。这项研究中解决的关键问题包括:“计算机成瘾”的参数,效用,风险和物质影响是什么?产生,谈判,合法化和/或贬低这些科学主张的修辞和社会过程是什么?计算机成瘾的性别维度是什么?结论是,“计算机成瘾”的概念不是纯粹的科学概念。相反,该概念的形成是社会产生的,并且在历史上曾作为一种机制来定义,谈判和管理各种复杂的机制,通过这些机制,计算机技术已融入并破坏了(有争议的)社会组织。

著录项

  • 作者

    Reed, Lori Kathleen.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 219 p.
  • 总页数 219
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号