• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A Qualitative Case Study of Strategies for Choosing and Evaluating Alternative Assessments in Online Higher Education.
【24h】

A Qualitative Case Study of Strategies for Choosing and Evaluating Alternative Assessments in Online Higher Education.

机译：定性案例研究，用于选择和评估在线高等教育的替代评估策略。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Studies have shown that not all students are assessed effectively using standard testing formats. However, it is unclear what alternative methodology would be useful to determine whether students have acquired the skills necessary for today's global market. This research study's purpose was to understand the processes instructors use when choosing and designing alternative assessments in higher education online courses to measure student performance. Using Gagne's conditions of learning and Bloom's Taxonomy as a framework to understand these processes, this qualitative case study examined 8 participants teaching online at Midwestern public universities. Interview data and course artifacts, including syllabi, rubrics, assessments, and grades, were gathered as evidence. These data were categorized by participant, interview question, and research question, and were then coded and analyzed to identify themes. The results indicated that, although objectives drive assessment indicators, they do not necessarily drive the assessment choice. They also indicated that the processes used by experienced instructors to determine assessment choices appear almost subconscious, although objectives are the major decision making point. This study impacts social change by helping identify areas where assessment selection is effective or ineffective, as well as where additional training needs to occur on alternative assessment options that accommodate changing student and workplace expectations better.
机译：研究表明，并非所有学生都可以使用标准考试格式进行有效评估。但是，尚不清楚哪种替代方法可用于确定学生是否已掌握了当今全球市场所需的技能。这项研究的目的是了解教师在选择和设计高等教育在线课程中的替代评估以衡量学生表现时所使用的过程。该定性案例研究以加涅（Gagne）的学习条件和布鲁姆（Bloom）分类法为框架来理解这些过程，研究了中西部公立大学在线授课的8名参与者。访谈数据和课程工件，包括教学大纲，评分标准，评估和成绩，均作为证据。这些数据按参与者，访谈问题和研究问题进行分类，然后进行编码和分析以识别主题。结果表明，尽管目标驱动评估指标，但不一定驱动评估选择。他们还指出，尽管目标是主要的决策点，但经验丰富的教练用来确定评估选择的过程几乎是下意识的。这项研究通过帮助确定评估选择有效或无效的领域，以及需要在替代评估选项上进行额外培训的领域，从而更好地适应学生和工作场所期望的变化，从而影响社会变革。

著录项

  • 作者

    Streff, Robert James.;

  • 作者单位

    Walden University.;

  • 授予单位 Walden University.;
  • 学科 Educational tests measurements.;Higher education.;Educational evaluation.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 235 p.
  • 总页数 235
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号