• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Ripe for change: Roles of planners and landscape architects at the interface of the land and the network in an alternative agriculture model for Upstate South Carolina.
【24h】

Ripe for change: Roles of planners and landscape architects at the interface of the land and the network in an alternative agriculture model for Upstate South Carolina.

机译：变革时机成熟：在南卡罗莱纳州北部的替代农业模式中，规划人员和景观设计师在土地和网络之间的接口中扮演的角色。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Both historically and in select areas today, local food systems are the main food supply for communities. Despite the fact that they are not a main source of food for most Americans, since the 1970s there has been a resurgence of U.S. local food systems (Qazi & Selfa, p.161). The movements exist in places where high-profile and vocal personalities (restaurateur, Alice Waters; author, Michael Pollan; or activist Carlo Petrini) also reside. This thesis examines whether the viability of the resurgence in local food systems depends on the commitment of a single person, and if not, whether those who affect the physical forms of communities, e.g. planners and landscape architects, have a role in creating and fostering the systems. Five counties (Anderson, Greenville, Oconee, Pickens and Spartanburg) of Upstate South Carolina have a local food movement, but it is a grassroots movement without a single person or organization at the helm. Without a figurehead it is not clear who is influencing, operating or facilitating the local food movement, particularly for produce. Using a mixed methodology, this study asks and answers the following question: "What role have planners and landscape architects played in the development of the local produce network of five Upstate counties in South Carolina and what roles do they continue to play?" The initial hypothesis is that planners are unknowingly contributing to and facilitating the local food movement; landscape architects, on the other hand, are acting in reaction to the movement; they are responding to their clients' (an end user in the network) desires to add local food components to new developments. Articulation of both the planners and landscape architects' roles in the local produce network, along with dissemination of the information, will enable them to consciously guide the movement and take action in accordance with that determined direction.
机译：在历史上和今天的某些地区，当地的粮食系统都是社区的主要粮食供应。尽管事实上并不是大多数美国人的主要食物来源，但自1970年代以来，美国当地的食物系统开始复苏（Qazi＆Selfa，第161页）。这些运动存在于举世瞩目的声音人物（餐馆老板，爱丽丝·沃特斯；作家迈克尔·波兰；或活动家卡洛·佩特里尼）的地方。本论文研究了当地粮食系统复兴的可行性是否取决于一个人的承诺，如果不是，是否会影响那些社区的自然形态，例如人类。规划师和景观设计师在创建和促进系统方面发挥作用。南卡罗来纳州北部的五个县（安德森，格林维尔，奥科尼，皮肯斯和斯巴达堡）都有地方食品运动，但它是基层运动，没有一个人或一个组织掌舵。没有figure头的人，不清楚是谁在影响，操作或促进当地的粮食运动，尤其是农产品。本研究使用一种混合方法，提出并回答了以下问题：“规划人员和景观设计师在南卡罗来纳州五个上州县的当地农产品网络的发展中扮演了什么角色，他们将继续扮演什么角色？”最初的假设是计划者在不知不觉中为当地的食物运动做出了贡献并为之提供了便利；另一方面，景观设计师则是对运动的反应。他们响应客户（网络中的最终用户）的愿望，将本地食品成分添加到新产品中。明确规划人员和景观设计师在当地农产品网络中的角色，以及信息的传播，将使他们能够有意识地指导运动并按照确定的方向采取行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号