• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Pension plan governance: The employer's conflicting roles as sponsor and administrator.
【24h】

Pension plan governance: The employer's conflicting roles as sponsor and administrator.

机译：养老金计划治理：雇主作为保荐人和管理人的角色相互冲突。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Ontario, almost all pension plans are administered by the employer. As a result, the employer wears two hats with respect to the pension plan. It is the administrator and simultaneously the sponsor.; The main purpose of this thesis is to highlight the problems raised by the structure of pension plans management where the employer is the administrator of the plan. I will first analyse how this structure of management works. I will then explain the statutory and common law duties imposed on the individuals involved in the management. We will see that there is uncertainty with regard to the delineation between the role of sponsor and administrator, and with regard to the duties attached to each of these roles. An inherent conflict of interest exists when at once a person is sponsor, and administrator.; Suggestions can be made to solve these problems. However, the only efficient propositions would entail the removal of the unilateral exercise of control and decision-making from the employer. A look at the Swiss and Quebec systems can be inspirational. Both systems have made participation of members in the management of pension plans mandatory. Participation is not a new concept, and we will briefly examine its governing principles.; Switzerland imposes joint management, with equality of employees and employer's representatives, while Quebec requires the pension plan to be administered by a pension committee composed of at least two members representatives and a neutral party. I will highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each system. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译：在安大略省，几乎所有养老金计划都由雇主管理。结果，雇主在退休金计划方面戴了两顶帽子。它是管理员，同时是发起人。本文的主要目的是突出由雇主作为退休金计划管理者的退休金计划管理结构所引起的问题。我将首先分析这种管理结构的工作方式。然后，我将解释对参与管理的个人施加的成文法和普通法义务。我们将看到，发起人和管理者的角色之间的界限以及与每个角色相关的职责存在不确定性。当一个人同时是发起人和管理员时，就会存在固有的利益冲突。可以提出解决这些问题的建议。但是，只有有效的主张才能消除雇主的单方面控制和决策权。看看瑞士和魁北克的体系可能会令人鼓舞。两种制度都强制成员参加养老金计划的管理。参与不是一个新概念，我们将简要研究其治理原则。瑞士实行联合管理，雇员和雇主代表应平等，而魁北克要求养老金计划由至少由两名成员代表和中立党组成的养老金委员会管理。我将重点介绍每种系统的优缺点。 （摘要由UMI缩短。）

著录项

  • 作者

    Troillet Maxwell, Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    York University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 York University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.; Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 192 p.
  • 总页数 192
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号