首页> 外文学位 >Confluence, convergence, and contextualization in philosophy and linguistics: The methodologies of Ricoeur and Pike (Paul Ricoeur, Kenneth L. Pike).
【24h】

Confluence, convergence, and contextualization in philosophy and linguistics: The methodologies of Ricoeur and Pike (Paul Ricoeur, Kenneth L. Pike).

机译:哲学和语言学中的融合,融合和语境化:Ricoeur和Pike的方法论(Paul Ricoeur,Kenneth L. Pike)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The valuable linguistic insights of Kenneth L. Pike, who developed tagmemic theory, have been formulated independently from the equally valuable work in philosophical hermeneutics done by Paul Ricoeur, who has apparently also been unaware of tagmemic linguistics. Robert E. Longacre has made considerable use of Ricoeur's work in the development of his own version of tagmemics, but this latter version of the theory differs crucially from Pike's. This present work examines areas of agreement in Pike and Ricoeur, particularly as these relate to their views of the nature of humanity, communication, and language. The comparison of their work is introductory rather than exhaustive. It seeks to provide a foundation for integration of the two scholars' work into a new, philosophically-based approach to linguistic analysis. This integrated framework will also be shown to provide the means whereby translators may begin to make more systematic use of literary critical theory, semiotics, and this newly developed method of linguistic analysis in their translation work. The earlier chapters of the dissertation explore the philosophical foundations of Pike and Ricoeur and develop the framework that begins to integrate their work. A transitional chapter explores various ways in which phenomenology, the philosophical foundation for both Ricoeur's and Pike's work, has been introduced to various disciplines within the humanities. Then, the later chapters take each of the areas, literary criticism, semiotics, and referential text analysis, showing how insights from each may be incorporated into the newly-extended tagmemic theory, especially as it applies to translation. A final chapter briefly explores how the new approach to linguistics provides a context for understanding analyses done in various sub-disciplines of linguistics, such as phonology, survey, and text analysis.
机译:肯尼思·派克(Kenneth L. Pike)提出了流行病学理论,该语言学的宝贵见解与保罗·里科尔(Paul Ricoeur)在哲学诠释学中同样有价值的工作无关,后者显然还不了解流行病学语言学。罗伯特·E·朗加尔(Robert E. Longacre)在开发自己的标签记忆学版本时充分利用了Ricoeur的著作,但该理论的后一版本与派克(Pike)的著作截然不同。本工作探讨了派克和里科的达成共识的领域,特别是这些领域与他们对人性,沟通和语言本质的看法有关。他们的工作比较只是介绍性的,而不是详尽的。它旨在为将两位学者的工作整合到一种新的基于哲学的语言分析方法中提供基础。这个集成的框架还将显示为翻译人员提供一种手段,使他们可以开始在翻译工作中更系统地使用文学批评理论,符号学和这种新近发展的语言分析方法。论文的前几章探讨了派克和里科尔的哲学基础,并建立了开始整合其工作的框架。一个过渡性的章节探讨了将现象学引入人文学科的各种方法,而现象学是理查德和派克作品的哲学基础。然后,后面的章节介绍了文学批评,符号学和参照文本分析的各个领域,展示了如何将每个领域的见识纳入新扩展的通俗理论中,尤其是在翻译中。最后一章简要探讨了语言学的新方法如何为理解语言学各个子学科(例如音系,调查和文本分析)中进行的分析提供了上下文。

著录项

  • 作者

    Radney, J. Randolph.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Arlington.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Arlington.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.; Philosophy.; Language General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 342 p.
  • 总页数 342
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;哲学理论;语言学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号