• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Magnet population versus nonmagnet population: A comparative study of students' achievement in reading and mathematics as measured by the Iowa Test of Basic Skills over four years.
【24h】

Magnet population versus nonmagnet population: A comparative study of students' achievement in reading and mathematics as measured by the Iowa Test of Basic Skills over four years.

机译：磁铁人口与非磁铁人口：通过爱荷华州基本技能测验四年来衡量的学生在阅读和数学方面的成就的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study was designed to compare the performance of magnet and nonmagnet populations on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills when the test data were disaggregated by race, socioeconomic status, and gender over a four year period. The research population consisted of 320 students in a magnet school in Southeast Georgia and 320 students in a nonmagnet school in Southeast Georgia. Both schools are in the same school system.;Four null hypotheses were used to test the data. H o1: There is no significant difference in the mean achievement of magnet school populations in reading and mathematics on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills when compared with nonmagnet students within the same school. H o2: There is no significant difference in the mean achievement of schools that have magnet programs when compared to students in schools that do not have magnet programs when measured by the students' scores in reading and mathematics on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills when total student populations were disaggregated by race, gender, and socioeconomic status. H o3: There is no significant difference in the mean achievement of nonmagnet eligible students in schools that do not have magnet programs when compared to students in nonmagnet populations in schools that house magnet programs when measured by the students' scores in reading and mathematics on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Ho4: There is no significant difference in the mean achievement of magnet eligible and nonmagnet students in schools that do not have magnet programs when measured by the students' scores in reading and math on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.;The major findings were that there was a significant difference ( p < .05) in the mean achievement of magnet school students in reading and mathematics on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. For three of the four years studied, the magnet students scored higher than the nonmagnet students. When the nonmagnet populations in each school were compared, no consistent pattern of significance could be determined for the four years. There was a significant (p < .05) main effect for race and achievement in reading and mathematics. Main effects for reading and math scores were not found to be significant for gender and socioeconomic status for all four years. However, significant (p < .05) main effects for socioeconomic status were found for two of the four years studied.
机译：这项研究旨在比较爱荷华州基本技能爱荷华州测验中按种族，社会经济地位和性别对四年内测验数据进行分类时，磁铁和非磁铁人群的表现。研究人群包括乔治亚州东南部一所磁铁学校的320名学生和乔治亚州东南部一所非磁铁学校的320名学生。两种学校都在同一学校系统中；使用四个无效假设来测试数据。假设：与同一学校内的非磁铁学生相比，在爱荷华州基本技能测验中，磁铁学校人口在阅读和数学上的平均成绩没有显着差异。 H o2：有磁性课程的学校的平均成绩与以爱荷华州基本技能测验的学生在阅读和数学上的分数进行衡量的无磁性课程的学生的总成绩相比，没有显着差异按种族，性别和社会经济地位对学生人口进行了分类。 H o3：与没有磁课程的学校中符合非磁铁资格的学生的平均成绩相比，根据学生在阅读和数学上的得分来衡量的，那些没有磁课程的学校中具有非磁铁项目的学生的平均成绩没有显着差异。爱荷华州的基本技能测试。 Ho4：以爱荷华州基本技能测验的学生在阅读和数学上的分数来衡量，在没有磁铁课程的学校中，符合磁铁资格的学生和非磁铁学生的平均成绩没有显着差异;主要发现是在爱荷华州基本技能测试中，磁铁学校学生在阅读和数学上的平均成绩存在显着差异（p <.05）。在学习的四年中的三年中，磁铁学生的得分高于非磁铁学生。当比较每所学校的非磁铁人口时，四年中无法确定一致的显着性模式。在阅读和数学方面，种族和成就有显着（p <.05）的主要影响。在四年中，阅读和数学成绩的主要影响对性别和社会经济地位均没有显着影响。但是，在所研究的四年中的两年中，发现了对社会经济地位的重大（p <.05）主要影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allen, Debra.;

  • 作者单位

    South Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 South Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Curriculum development.;Elementary education.;Educational tests measurements.;Reading instruction.;Mathematics education.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 10 p.
  • 总页数 10
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号