• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Protecting the civilian in zones of conflict: The case of the war in the former Yugoslavia and humanitarian relief personnel as human rights activists.
【24h】

Protecting the civilian in zones of conflict: The case of the war in the former Yugoslavia and humanitarian relief personnel as human rights activists.

机译：在冲突地区保护平民：前南斯拉夫的战争和作为人权活动家的人道主义救济人员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This thesis is a two part study of justice. The trauma of conflict in developing countries which has resulted in deprivation that increase their vulnerability to further conflict is becoming an increasing challenge to those involved in medical humanitarian relief. A core consideration of the concept of rehabilitation of a society traumatized by conflict is that recovery assistance should include emotional recovery and not be exclusively concentrated on physical needs. First, it is my contention that it is no longer acceptable for the international community to allow the powerful and brutal forces in this world to impose indiscriminate reigns of terror upon innocent civilian populations without seeking some form of recompense and justice. The second part of this thesis explores the gap in the humanitarian aid community's operational ability to respond to instability and conflict. The ability of aid organisations to achieve conflict mitigation, management, and resolution are increasingly dependent upon the different range of skills and the comparative advantage of each player. It is my contention that divergent views need to reach a consensus in order to bring to an end further disputes that may hamper the effective delivery of relief. The opportunities and challenges of non-interventionist emergency aid strategy is contrasted with interventionist developmental strategy. Two theories of justice are utilized to help solve an ethical dilemma faced by humanitarian relief personnel. Thus criteria for evaluating ethical dilemmas are established. The thesis concludes with some implications for the future regarding the deterrence affect of international criminal courts.
机译：本文是对正义的两部分研究。发展中国家的冲突创伤已导致被剥夺，使他们更容易遭受进一步冲突，这对那些参与医疗人道主义救济的人构成了越来越大的挑战。对受冲突困扰的社会的恢复概念的核心考虑是，恢复援助应包括情绪恢复，而不应仅专注于身体需要。首先，我认为，国际社会不再允许这个世界上强大而残酷的部队对无辜平民施加不加区别的恐怖统治，而不寻求某种形式的报偿和正义。本文的第二部分探讨了人道主义援助界应对不稳定和冲突的业务能力的差距。援助组织实现缓解，管理和解决冲突的能力越来越取决于技能的不同范围和每个参与者的相对优势。我的论点是，需要达成共识，以制止可能阻碍有效救济的进一步纠纷。非干预主义紧急援助战略的机遇与挑战与干预主义发展战略形成鲜明对比。两种正义理论被用来帮助解决人道主义救济人员面临的道德困境。因此，建立了评估道德困境的标准。本文的结论对国际刑事法院的威慑作用对未来具有一定的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kingsland, Karen Beverley.;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Mary's University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Saint Mary's University (Canada).;
  • 学科 International law.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 201 p.
  • 总页数 201
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号