• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Literary materialism: The application of literary models of analysis to non-literary phenomena.
【24h】

Literary materialism: The application of literary models of analysis to non-literary phenomena.

机译：文学唯物主义：将文学分析模型应用于非文学现象。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the last hundred years, literary studies has been particularly adept at incorporating the critical techniques of fields as diverse as economics and psychoanalysis into studies of literature. However, literary techniques of analysis specific to the study of literature have not been widely accepted by other fields. Specifically, the literary techniques of rereading, close reading and the resistance to solutions have been isolated to literary studies and related fields in the humanities. The purpose of this project is to explore the possibilities and implications of applying literary techniques of analysis to a wide range of non-literary fields.; In order to understand and overcome the resistance to the broader adoption of literary techniques of analysis, I address the specific reservations voiced by a range of social critics. The central concern of these critics has been a perceived disjunction between the material nature of the 'real' world and the non-material nature of literary texts. Using examples from literature, economics, and art, I address these reservations and develop an expanded sense of the material and the literary that allows them to function together.; The results of my project demonstrate that the barriers to the application of literary analysis have been exaggerated and, therefore, literary techniques can be applied outside of fields traditionally concerned with understanding literature. A reconception of the material through literary techniques can generate better results in some instances than more strictly drawn materially based methods of analysis. Finally, I conclude that there is an unique ethical dimension to literary analysis that is often lacking in more traditional critical systems.
机译：在过去的一百年中，文学研究尤其擅长将经济学和精神分析等众多领域的关键技术纳入文学研究。但是，专门用于文学研究的文学分析技术尚未被其他领域广泛接受。具体而言，重读，近距离阅读和对解决方案的抵制等文学技术已被隔离到人文学科的文学研究和相关领域。该项目的目的是探索将文学分析技术应用于广泛的非文学领域的可能性和影响。为了理解和克服对广泛采用文学分析技术的抵制，我提出了一系列社会评论家的具体保留意见。这些批评家的主要关注点是“现实”世界的物质性质与文学文本的非物质性质之间的明显脱节。我使用文学，经济学和艺术中的例子来解决这些保留，并扩大了对材料和文学的理解，使它们能够共同发挥作用。我的项目结果表明，文学分析应用的障碍已被夸大，因此，文学技术可以在传统上与理解文学有关的领域之外应用。在某些情况下，通过文学技术对材料的重新构想可能会比更严格地绘制基于材料的分析方法产生更好的结果。最后，我得出结论，在更为传统的批评体系中，文学分析通常缺乏独特的伦理学维度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cecil, Wesley David.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Language Rhetoric and Composition.; Economics Theory.; Sociology Theory and Methods.; Literature General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 266 p.
  • 总页数 266
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 语言学;经济学;社会学理论与方法论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号