• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >What the Frack Are We Talking About? The Interrelated Roles of Science, Media, and Strategic Communication in the Public Debate of Fracking in North Carolina and New York.
【24h】

What the Frack Are We Talking About? The Interrelated Roles of Science, Media, and Strategic Communication in the Public Debate of Fracking in North Carolina and New York.

机译：我们在谈论什么Frack？科学，媒体和战略传播在北卡罗莱纳州和纽约的压裂公共辩论中的相互关联作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A scientifically complex policy issue with implications for the environment, the economy, and the community, fracking has become a hot-button political issue across the United States. Proponents of fracking point to the economic benefits and argue that it is a safe method for extracting natural gas, a cleaner alternative to coal, and an untapped resource in many areas of the United States. Opponents, on the other hand, argue that the process produces significant environmental and health effects, such as contamination of water supplies and air pollution. Yet state level legislation and regulation must be pursued even without scientific consensus. North Carolina has a small amount of shale gas available, yet fast-tracked legislation to allow fracking in the state, while New York, which sits on the natural gas-rich Marcellus Shale, put into place a ban on fracking.;Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework, I implemented a multi-method approach, incorporating content analysis of media coverage, fieldwork, and interviews with stakeholders in each state to examine the myriad roles of scientific and technical information, media, and strategic communication in the public debate of fracking. In bringing interdisciplinary research from media effects, political communication, sociology, and public relations to this framework, I have been able to analyze the different factors we must account for when studying public debate over environmental policy issues, such the strategic communication actions of stakeholders, the role of the media, and the deliberate use of scientific and technical information in developing a policy image.;I develop a model that provides a structure for examining the main factors (scientific and technical information, media, and strategic communication) of the public debate that influences public policy for environmental issues that have strong scientific components. It also provides a mechanism for better understanding not only how the roles and influence of these factors can shift during the course of the debate, but also how they can shift in relation to each other.
机译：压裂是一个对环境，经济和社区都有影响的科学复杂的政策问题，已经成为全美国的热门政治问题。压裂的支持者指出了经济利益，并认为这是一种在美国许多地区开采天然气的安全方法，更清洁的煤炭替代品以及未开发的资源。反对者则认为，该过程会产生重大的环境和健康影响，例如供水污染和空气污染。然而，即使没有科学共识，也必须奉行州一级的法律法规。北卡罗来纳州拥有少量页岩气，但立法允许在该州进行压裂，而快进的立法则是位于天然气资源丰富的Marcellus页岩上的纽约实施了压裂禁令。在联盟框架中，我实施了一种多方法的方法，包括对媒体报道，实地调查以及与各州利益相关者的访谈进行内容分析，以研究科学技术信息，媒体和战略传播在水力压裂的公开辩论中的多种作用。在将跨媒体研究，媒体传播，政治传播，社会学和公共关系的研究引入这一框架时，我能够分析研究环境政策问题的公众辩论时必须考虑的不同因素，例如利益相关者的战略传播行为，媒体的作用，以及在制定政策形象时故意使用科学技术信息。；我开发了一个模型，该模型为检查公众的主要因素（科学技术信息，媒体和战略传播）提供了结构影响公共政策的辩论，涉及具有强大科学成分的环境问题。它还提供了一种机制，不仅可以更好地理解辩论过程中这些因素的作用和影响如何发生变化，而且还可以理解它们之间如何发生变化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hedding, Kylah J.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Communication.;Mass communication.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 166 p.
  • 总页数 166
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号