• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The polarization of the union movement in postwar Japan: Politics in the unions of steel and railway workers.
【24h】

The polarization of the union movement in postwar Japan: Politics in the unions of steel and railway workers.

机译：战后日本工会运动的两极分化：钢铁工人和铁路工人工会的政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The union movement in postwar Japan is often characterized by cooperative economic unionism. However, cooperative economic unionism was not the dominant feature of the labor movement from the beginning of the postwar period. Instead, it developed out of conflicts with militant and political unionism. To trace the conflicts between the two types of unionism in the history of the postwar labor movement, this dissertation examines the internal politics of Tekkororen (the Japan Federation of Steel Workers' Unions) and that of Kokuro (the Japan National Railway Workers' Union). These unions represented the two types of unionism, and the rivalry between the two unions had an important influence on the development of the labor movement in postwar Japan as a whole.; Through an analysis of the internal politics of the unions, the dissertation shows that there were factions advocating the two types of unionism in Tekkororen and Kokuro in the earlier postwar period, but that the leadership of the unions came to be dominated by the factions that advocated cooperative economic unionism and militant political unionism, respectively. The dissertation links the development of these polarized policy orientations to interactions among the unions, management, and the state. The management of the steel firms strongly influenced the development of the internal politics of Tekkororen in such a way that the pro-management faction dominated the union leadership. In the case of Kokuro, the militant policy orientation prevailed because of confrontations between the union and the state due to frequent state intervention into the union-management relations of the Japan National Railways.; Based on the analysis, the dissertation argues that the interests of union members do not directly reflect social values or socio-economic structures, but are defined through politics played within unions as well as among unions, management, and the state. It also casts doubt on the implicit assumption of previous theories of union politics that the internal political process of labor unions is relatively autonomous from the influence of management and the state, and argues that management and the state may influence the very way that the internal politics of unions develops.
机译：战后日本的工会运动通常以合作经济联盟主义为特征。但是，从战后开始，合作经济联盟主义并不是工人运动的主要特征。相反，它是从与好战和政治联盟的冲突中发展出来的。为了追溯战后工运历史上两种类型的工会之间的冲突，本文研究了Tekkororen（日本钢铁工人工会联合会）和Kokuro（日本全国铁路工人工会）的内部政治。 。这些工会代表了两种类型的工会主义，并且两个工会之间的竞争对整个战后日本的劳工运动的发展产生了重要影响。通过对工会内部政治的分析，论文表明，战后初期，Tekkororen和Kokuro中有一些主张提倡两种工会主义的派系，但工会的领导层主要由提倡的派系主导。合作经济联盟和好战政治联盟。本文将这些两极化政策取向的发展与工会，管理层和国家之间的互动联系起来。钢铁公司的管理层强烈地影响了Tekkororen内部政治的发展，以至于亲管理派别主导了工会领导层。就国九郎而言，好战的政策取向之所以盛行，是因为日本与日本国铁的工会与管理关系频繁受到政府干预，导致工会与国家之间发生对抗。在此基础上，本文认为工会成员的利益并不直接反映社会价值观或社会经济结构，而是通过工会内部以及工会，管理层和国家之间的政治来界定的。这也使人们对以前的工会政治理论的隐含假设产生了怀疑，即工会的内部政治进程相对独立于管理和国家的影响，并认为管理和国家可能影响内部政治的方式。工会的发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Suzuki, Akira.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Sociology Industrial and Labor Relations.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 373 p.
  • 总页数 373
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学;世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号