• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Where identity and trauma converge: Hindu-Muslim perceptions of the 2002 Gujarati riots.
【24h】

Where identity and trauma converge: Hindu-Muslim perceptions of the 2002 Gujarati riots.

机译：身份和创伤在哪里交汇：印度穆斯林对2002年古吉拉特邦暴动的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The 2002 Gujarati Riots were one of the worst outbreaks of violence between Hindus and Muslims in India in recent history. While there have been some publications on the incident, there has been a startling lack of studies that have looked at the victims' experiences of the riots. The current study examined Hindu and Muslim perceptions of the riots by conducting a qualitative analysis of interview data. 10 Hindus and 7 Muslims currently residing in the United States that were in Gujarat during the 2002 Riots were interviewed using a semi-structured interview protocol. The interview consisted of questions pertaining to social identity, acculturation, experience during the riots, government involvement, solutions, and coping. Using Strauss and Corbin's model of modified grounded theory, both Hindu and Muslim summaries of the interviews were analyzed using Nvivo7 Software (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). Upon review of the subthemes that emerged, three principal distinctions between the Hindu and Muslim respondents were noted: (1) perceptions of the responsibility of the Gujarati government, (2) affect resulting from the experience of the riots, and (3) coping strategies utilized. In terms of beliefs about the government's role in the atrocities the Hindu participants perceived that the local and state governments acted to prevent and mitigate deterrents during the 2002 Gujarati violence, whereas the Muslim community believed the government was anti-Muslim, and helped to perpetuate the violence. Second, the feelings of hopelessness and helplessness stemming from the experience of the 2002 event that were expressed by the Muslim sample were not present among the Hindu interviewees. Third, each group of respondents relied on diverse coping mechanisms to help give meaning to the experience of the riots. The Hindu participants overwhelmingly used denial and suppression to subsequently deal with the experience, while the Muslim respondents expressed relying on their religious faith, discussing the experience within peer and familial groups, and their desire to seek justice as strategies for attempting to heal and move forward. Implications of the results were discussed based on social and cultural identity models, including in-group and out-group formation. Lastly, specific interventions and future areas of research were proposed.
机译：2002年的古吉拉特邦暴动是印度历史上印度教徒和穆斯林之间最严重的暴力事件之一。尽管有一些关于这一事件的出版物，但令人震惊的是，缺乏研究研究受害者对暴动的经历的研究。本研究通过对采访数据进行定性分析，检验了印度教徒和穆斯林对暴动的看法。使用半结构化访谈协议对2002年骚乱期间在古吉拉特邦居住的10名印度教徒和7名穆斯林进行了采访。访谈包括与社会认同，文化适应，骚乱期间的经验，政府参与，解决方案和应对有关的问题。使用Strauss和Corbin的修改后的理论模型，使用Nvivo7软件对访谈的印度教和穆斯林摘要进行了分析（Strauss＆Corbin，1998）。在对出现的子主题进行审查时，注意到印度教徒和穆斯林受访者之间的三个主要区别：（1）对古吉拉特邦政府责任的看法；（2）骚乱产生的影响；（3）应对策略利用。根据对政府在暴行中的作用的信念，印度教徒认为在2002年古吉拉特邦暴力事件期间，地方政府和州政府采取了预防和减轻威慑的行动，而穆斯林社区则认为政府是反穆斯林的，并帮助使穆斯林长期存在。暴力。其次，在印度教受访者中，并没有表现出穆斯林样本所表达的源自2002年事件的绝望和无助感。第三，每组受访者都依靠不同的应对机制来帮助给暴乱的经历赋予意义。印度教徒参加者压倒性地使用压制和压制来处理随后的经历，而穆斯林受访者则表示依靠他们的宗教信仰，讨论同伴和家庭群体中的经历，以及寻求正义作为试图治愈和前进的策略的愿望。 。基于社会和文化认同模型，包括小组内和小组外形成，讨论了结果的含义。最后，提出了具体的干预措施和未来的研究领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Patel, Nishant.;

  • 作者单位

    Widener University, Institute for Graduate Clinical Psychology.;

  • 授予单位 Widener University, Institute for Graduate Clinical Psychology.;
  • 学科 Clinical psychology.;Social psychology.;Asian history.;Ethnic studies.;Religion.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 162 p.
  • 总页数 162
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号