• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparative study of welfare state development: Event history analysis of social insurance legislation in eighteen economically advanced capitalist countries, 1880-1980.
【24h】

A comparative study of welfare state development: Event history analysis of social insurance legislation in eighteen economically advanced capitalist countries, 1880-1980.

机译：福利国家发展的比较研究：18个经济发达的资本主义国家中社会保险立法的事件历史分析，1880-1980年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The origin and development of welfare state has generally been explained by four major theories. They are "logic of industrialism," "political conflict explanation," "state-centered approach," and "international diffusion theory." This study examines welfare state development among 18 economically advanced capitalist countries from 1880 to 1980. The purpose is to determine which theory best explains welfare state development. Unlike previous studies, this study considers the welfare state as measured by the year of adoption of five major social insurance programs, and empirically tests hypotheses derived from those theories within an event history analysis framework.;The survival analyses of five social insurance programs present mixed results. The adoption of each social insurance program is developed and related to a combination of industrialism, modernization, left-class participation, state autonomy, and international environment. Based on these findings, it is concluded that no single paradigm adequately explains the rise of the welfare state. However, the combination of two society-centered approaches namely, logic of industrialism and political conflict explanation, and state-centered approach better explains the origin and development of welfare state than does the international diffusion theory. Industrialism and modernization are factors in the rise of welfare state, as is left-class participation. The state itself also has an autonomous capacity in promoting the welfare state. However, international relations or the role of international organizations had no or negative influence on the development of the welfare state. In addition, culturally heterogeneous nations are more likely to adopt unemployment insurance and family allowance programs earlier than homogeneous nations. In summary, this study concludes that domestic-related theories, rather than international diffusion theory, provide a more persuasive explanation for welfare state development.
机译：福利国家的起源和发展一般用四个主要理论来解释。它们是“工业主义逻辑”，“政治冲突解释”，“以国家为中心的方法”和“国际扩散理论”。这项研究考察了1880年至1980年间18个经济发达的资本主义国家中的福利国家发展。目的是确定哪种理论最能解释福利国家的发展。与以前的研究不同，本研究考虑了通过采用五种主要社会保险计划的年份来衡量的福利状态，并在事件历史分析框架内对来自这些理论的假设进行了实证检验。结果。每个社会保险计划的采用都是经过发展的，并且与工业主义，现代化，左派参与，国家自治和国际环境相结合。根据这些发现，可以得出结论，没有哪个范式足以说明福利国家的兴起。但是，与国际扩散理论相比，两种以社会为中心的方法，即工业主义的逻辑和政治冲突的解释，以及以国家为中心的方法的结合，更好地解释了福利国家的起源和发展。工业化和现代化是福利国家兴起的因素，左翼阶级的参与也是如此。国家本身也具有促进福利国家的自治能力。但是，国际关系或国际组织的作用对福利国家的发展没有影响或没有负面影响。另外，文化上异质的国家比同质的国家更早采用失业保险和家庭津贴计划。总而言之，这项研究得出的结论是，与国内有关的理论而非国际扩散理论为福利国家的发展提供了更具说服力的解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Kyo-Seong.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Law.;Economics General.;Political Science Public Administration.;Social Work.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 135 p.
  • 总页数 135
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号