• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of scientific research administrators' leadership practices in public and private universities.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of scientific research administrators' leadership practices in public and private universities.

机译：对公立和私立大学科研管理人员领导实践的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine, using a comparative analysis, the leadership ability, managerial skills, and decision-making skills of research administrators in the scientific research laboratories at public and private universities and at independent research laboratories. More specifically, this researcher also investigated the influences of type of research center, age, gender, years of experience, and geographical region, separate and combined, on the leadership practices of research administrators. A 2 x 2 x 3 and a 2 x 3 x 3 factorial design were employed in this investigation.;Six hundred twenty-nine research administrators from all sections of the United States were randomly selected to participate in this empirical study. An instrument entitled "The Leadership Practices Inventory-Self, LPI - Self" was used to collect the data. The investigative instrument was validated by panel of experts in Higher Education Administration. This instrument had an alpha reliability coefficient of .98 for the test as a whole.;Moreover, the data were treated through the application of the Three-Way Analysis of Variance and the Scheffe Post Hoc Test. Among the conclusions of this study were: research affiliation had a significant effect on the decision-making skills of research administrators; the older a research administrator the higher the level of his decision-making skills; and sex had no influence on the decision-making skills of research administrators.
机译：这项研究的目的是使用比较分析来检查公立和私立大学以及独立研究实验室的科研实验室中研究管理人员的领导能力，管理技能和决策能力。更具体地说，该研究人员还调查了研究中心类型，年龄，性别，经验年限和地理区域（单独和合并）对研究管理人员领导实践的影响。在这项研究中，采用了2 x 2 x 3和2 x 3 x 3的析因设计。来自美国所有地区的629名研究管理员被随机选择参加这项实证研究。使用了一个名为“领导力实践清单-自我，LPI-自我”的工具来收集数据。该调查手段得到了高等教育管理专家小组的验证。整个测试该仪器的alpha可靠性系数为0.98。此外，通过使用方差三向分析和Scheffe Post Hoc测试对数据进行了处理。这项研究的结论包括：研究隶属关系对研究管理者的决策能力有重大影响；研究管理员越老，他的决策技能水平就越高；性别对研究管理者的决策能力没有影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Muhammad, Amin.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Southern University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Southern University.;
  • 学科 Higher education.;Educational administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 186 p.
  • 总页数 186
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号