• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Varieties of marketization in China: The impact of private entrepreneurs, local governments, and state-owned enterprises.
【24h】

Varieties of marketization in China: The impact of private entrepreneurs, local governments, and state-owned enterprises.

机译：中国市场化的多样性：私营企业家，地方政府和国有企业的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

China has successfully marketized its economy since the late 1970s. The Chinese type of market economy in general is called as a market economy with Chinese characteristics that features of both market-based economy and planned economy coexist. However, it is hard to define features of a market economy with Chinese characteristics as a single term if varieties of features of local market economies within China are closely looked into. Instead, each locality has developed a local market economy that tends to be different from each other and thereby shows different performance in areas of economic growth and local governance. What factors account for the differences?;This study pays close attention to roles and effects of local government and private entrepreneurial class focusing on three localities in China in the course of marketization, based on the assumption that, at the local level in post-Maoist China, transitional paths toward a market-based economy from the planned economy are significantly affected by leading actors such as local governments, private entrepreneurs, or state-owned enterprises; economic development and formation of vibrant local market economy tend to be strongest when led by private entrepreneurs and weakest when led by state-owned enterprises. It especially focuses on formation of private entrepreneurial class and its roles in constructing a local market society. It poses that Wenzhou, among three localities for this research, where private entrepreneurial class was the driving force for local marketization tends to build a vibrant local market society in terms of economic growth and local governance in favor of market economy; Sunan where the local government played a leading role in the local market reform is likely to achieve economic growth, but simultaneously to constrain development of private entrepreneurial class, and eventually to restrain formation of a local market economy based on non-state private economic sector; Anshan where state-owned enterprises sector dominates the local economy substantially contraines both growth of private entrepreneurial class and a local market economy.;By comparing three different pathways toward market economy (private entrepreneur-led, local government-led, and state economic sector-dominated path) and focusing on roles of local governments and private entrepreneurs for the local marketization, the work first elaborates on how the three different localities have formed different market economies under the same macro-institutional framework of the Communist Party of China (CPC)-led economic transformation. It examines, in the initial time of China's reform, how endowed socio-economic resources have led three different localities to take different paths. Secondly, it examines roles and effects of different major actors for marketization with a research question that: who was the driving force for marketization at the locality, the local government, or private entrepreneur, or state economic sector? Thirdly, it demonstrates that private entrepreneurs are the champion of marketization. Lastly, this dissertation highlights that private entrepreneurial class as a significant social force also affects development of local governance in favor of a local market economy, which makes a local market work well.
机译：自1970年代后期以来，中国已经成功地实现了经济市场化。通常，中国类型的市场经济被称为具有中国特色的市场经济，既有市场经济又有计划经济的特征。但是，如果仔细研究中国本地市场经济的各种特征，很难将具有中国特色的市场经济的特征定义为一个术语。取而代之的是，每个地区都发展了一个当地市场经济，这种市场经济往往彼此不同，从而在经济增长和地方治理领域表现出不同的表现。造成这些差异的因素是什么？；本研究密切关注了地方政府和私人企业家阶层在市场化过程中关注中国三个地方的作用和影响，其假设是，在后毛主义的地方层面在中国，从计划经济向市场经济的过渡路径受到当地政府，私营企业家或国有企业等主要参与者的重大影响；在私营企业家的带领下，经济发展和充满活力的地方市场经济的形成往往最强劲，而在国有企业的带领下，则最弱。它特别关注私人企业家阶层的形成及其在构建当地市场社会中的作用。在本研究的三个地区中，以温州人为代表的民营企业家阶层是推动当地市场化的动力，因此在经济增长和地方治理方面倾向于建立一个充满活力的本地市场社会，有利于市场经济。地方政府在地方市场改革中发挥领导作用的苏南可能实现经济增长，但同时又限制了私人企业家阶层的发展，并最终限制了以非国有私人经济部门为基础的地方市场经济的形成；鞍山的国有企业在当地经济中占主导地位，这与私营企业家阶层的增长和本地市场经济都大相径庭。主导路径），并着重于地方政府和私营企业家在当地市场化中的作用，这项工作首先阐述了三个不同的地方如何在中国共产党（CPC）的同一宏观制度框架下形成不同的市场经济。带动了经济转型。它研究了在中国改革之初，所赋予的社会经济资源如何导致三个不同地区采取不同的道路。其次，它以一个研究问题来考察不同主要参与者在市场化中的作用和作用：谁是地方，地方政府，私人企业家或国有经济部门的市场化动力？第三，它表明私营企业家是市场化的拥护者。最后，本文着重指出，私营企业家阶层作为一种重要的社会力量，也影响了地方治理的发展，有利于地方市场经济，这使地方市场运转良好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Ji-Yong.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 354 p.
  • 总页数 354
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号