• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A framework for enhancing public participation in United States Forest Service social impact analysis.
【24h】

A framework for enhancing public participation in United States Forest Service social impact analysis.

机译：加强公众参与美国森林服务社社会影响分析的框架。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Social impact analysis (SIA) is a specific process institutionalized by the USDA Forest Service to meet the requirements for analyzing effects found in the National Environmental Policy Act, the Resources Planning Act, and the National Forest Management Act. SIA practitioners approach their work from two general perspectives: a technocratic-research approach and a participatory-planning approach. The key assumption of the technocratic-research approach is that given significant data, specialists can make predictions about the future using established projection techniques. The key assumptions of the participatory-planning approach include the idea that SIA is a logical part of the decision process, that valid and useful data can come from anywhere, and that decisions about environmental and social impacts should be jointly arrived at by agency officials and the people affected by the project or plan. The Forest Service has most closely followed the technocratic-research approach. Two of the challenges facing those conducting SIA are identifying social impact categories to use in analyzing potential impacts from a management decision, and involving the public in the SIA process. Research conducted in conjunction with the Wisconsin National Forests Socioeconomic Roundtable suggests that there are ways to address these two challenges and to move the Forest Service away from the technocratic-research approach and toward the participatory-planning approach to SIA. Recommendations include using a delphi survey technique and focus groups to (1) identify impact categories for SIA, and (2) anticipate potential impacts of management actions.
机译：社会影响分析（SIA）是美国农业部森林服务局制度化的特定过程，可满足分析《国家环境政策法》，《资源计划法》和《国家森林管理法》中发现的影响的要求。 SIA从业人员从两个总体角度来开展工作：技术官僚研究方法和参与性计划方法。技术官僚研究方法的关键假设是，只要有大量数据，专家就可以使用已建立的投影技术对未来进行预测。参与式计划方法的主要假设包括以下想法：SIA是决策过程中的逻辑部分，有效和有用的数据可以来自任何地方，有关环境和社会影响的决策应由机构官员和受项目或计划影响的人。森林服务处一直最严格地遵循技术专家研究方法。进行SIA的人员面临的两个挑战是确定社会影响类别，以用于分析管理决策的潜在影响，并使公众参与SIA流程。与威斯康星州国家森林社会经济圆桌会议一起进行的研究表明，有多种方法可以应对这两个挑战，并使森林服务局从技术专家研究方法向SIA的参与性计划方法发展。建议包括使用delphi调查技术和焦点小组来（1）确定SIA的影响类别，以及（2）预测管理措施的潜在影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jakes, Pamela Joyce.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.;Political Science Public Administration.;Agriculture Forestry and Wildlife.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 77 p.
  • 总页数 77
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号