• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The illegitimate muse: Poetry, reality, and dissent in the work of Zbigniew Herbert, Philip Larkin, and Jim Daniels.
【24h】

The illegitimate muse: Poetry, reality, and dissent in the work of Zbigniew Herbert, Philip Larkin, and Jim Daniels.

机译：私生子的缪斯女神：Zbigniew Herbert，Philip Larkin和Jim Daniels的作品中的诗歌，现实和异议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I consider the non-absolutist conceptions of experience expressed by these three poets in the late 20th century, and how their comprehension of social context determines their commitment to moral values. These poets include the shared experiences of the social community in their writing in order to indicate the value of human effort in its own right, exclusive of the authority of any abstract system meant to govern conduct. The historical, cultural, and social circumstances each poet writes within determine the forms of poetic expression by which this affirmation of human association can be realized and articulated. The first chapter establishes the writing of Zbigniew Herbert, of Poland, as a model for non-absolutist poetic discourse. In developing this model I consider the philosophical and historical commentary of Herbert's contemporaries, Leszek Kolakowski and Adam Michnik, and the issue of provincialism in the work of a poetic precursor, Jozef Czechowicz. I also include, in contrast to Herbert, a discussion of Czeslaw Milosz and Modernism. The second and third chapters consider the extent to which the Herbert model applies to the work of Philip Larkin in Britain, and Jim Daniels in the United States. Common to all three poets is how they use poetic language to speak about reality so that abstract meanings meant to govern conduct can be called into question. Their poetic language is clear, direct, and reasonable. Their frame of reference is the world of actuality where meanings can be examined by their real effects upon individuals and their common welfare. Depending on their own local situation, each places a different emphasis on how they apprehend cultural tradition, political agendas, and personal desires as the sources of absolutism. Where they find meaning to be a function of absolutism they also invariably find that meaning as a function of social interaction and social cooperation becomes trivialized as something impure, improper, illegitimate, or wrong. Meaningfulness is important to these poets as something that originates in, and changes through, experience and actions. They do not find continuity of meaning in terms of an ultimate end or a pre-existing source, but as a continuity of change through social interaction in everyday situations. Their poetic discourse is a moral discourse that is not moralistic. Rather than seeking a morality of transcendence, they adopt a morality that is based upon individual choice. It is not merely living in the world, but also an acceptance of it which must include an acceptance of responsibility for the world.
机译：我考虑了这三位诗人在20世纪后期所表达的非绝对主义的体验观，以及他们对社会背景的理解如何决定了他们对道德价值观的承诺。这些诗人在写作中包含了社会共同体的共同经验，目的是表明人类自身努力的价值，不包括任何旨在支配行为的抽象系统的权威。每位诗人的写作所处的历史，文化和社会环境决定了诗歌表达的形式，通过这种形式，可以实现和阐明对人际交往的肯定。第一章建立了波兰兹比格涅夫·赫伯特（Zbigniew Herbert）的著作，以此作为非绝对主义诗歌话语的典范。在建立这种模型时，我考虑了赫伯特同时代的莱泽克·科拉科夫斯基和亚当·米奇尼克的哲学和历史评论，以及诗意前驱者约瑟夫·捷科维奇的作品中的地方主义问题。与赫伯特相反，我还包括对切斯瓦夫·米洛什和现代主义的讨论。第二章和第三章考虑了赫伯特模型在多大程度上适用于英国的菲利普·拉金和美国的吉姆·丹尼尔斯。这三位诗人的共同点是，他们如何使用诗歌语言来谈论现实，从而使支配行为的抽象含义受到质疑。他们的诗意语言清晰，直接，合理。他们的参照系是现实世界，意义可以通过意义对个人及其共同福利的真实影响来检验。每个人都根据自己的当地情况，以不同的方式强调他们如何理解文化传统，政治议程和个人欲望，将其作为专制主义的根源。在他们发现意义是专制主义的作用时，他们也总是发现，作为社会互动和社会合作的作用，意义变得不重要，琐碎，不正当，非法或错误。意义对这些诗人很重要，因为它们源自经验和行为，并通过经验和行为而发生变化。他们没有找到意义的连续性，无论是最终目的还是已有的来源，而是通过日常情况下的社会互动来改变的连续性。他们的诗话是一种非道德的道德话语。他们没有寻求超越的道德，而是采用了基于个人选择的道德。它不仅生活在世界上，而且对它的接受还必须包括对世界责任的接受。

著录项

  • 作者

    Saladyga, Michael.;

  • 作者单位

    Brandeis University.;

  • 授予单位 Brandeis University.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 218 p.
  • 总页数 218
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号