• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Knowledge-mapping American Cold War ideological and situational information: The epistemical content of United States foreign policy statements in NSC-68, Iran 1953, and the Dominican Republic 1965.
【24h】

Knowledge-mapping American Cold War ideological and situational information: The epistemical content of United States foreign policy statements in NSC-68, Iran 1953, and the Dominican Republic 1965.

机译：知识映射美国冷战时期的思想和情势信息：NSC-68、1953年伊朗和1965年多米尼加共和国的美国外交政策声明的认识论内容。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Political Science community's failure to predict, or even consider a relatively peaceful end of the Cold War has resurrected interest in ideological influence on American Foreign Policy. This raises questions about 'epistemical communities' and their effect on the creation, maintenance, and downfall of political consensus. This dissertation finds research on 'epistemical communities' is best suited for application in historical case studies because of lack of access to the bureaucratic process, political actors, and government held information in present day circumstances. However, analysts do have access to the 'epistemical content' of government released information at their immediate disposal. This data may be qualitatively analyzed for both explicit content and implicit meaning.;The theory and methodology are tested in three Cold War case studies over the period 1950 to 1965. Primary and secondary sources over are used to construct a historical context for each case study, followed by a methodological rendering of official textual material. In an evaluation section feedback questions are generated about the combination of ideological and situational material to question the extent of 'expert' transparency and completeness. In the conclusion is an assessment of this research framework's applicability to contemporary analysis of the American foreign policy decisionmaking process.;This dissertation employs a theoretical dichotomy between ideological and situational information with an artificial intelligence methodology, called 'knowledge mapping,' used in expert system construction. The methodology is based on a decision tree-like rendering of presidential administration material into a hierarchy of independent and dependent textual nodes similar to semantical grammar networks. Like those who construct expert systems, political scientists are concerned with fully modeling experts' analytical reasoning (transparency) and the logical steps in their problem solving regimen (completeness). Employment of a feedback mechanism assists in this process. Unlike expert systems participants, political operatives are not considered accessible collaborators, but non-cooperative subjects seeking to build a critical audience mass of supporters on single issue decisions by manipulating target group ideological predispositions. The utilization of government secrecy and executive privilege assist a presidential administration in implementing its favored policy while limiting the range of debate over alternative foreign policy options.
机译：政治学界未能预测甚至没有考虑到冷战的相对和平结束，这已经使人们对意识形态对美国外交政策的影响重新产生了兴趣。这就引发了关于“病态社区”及其对政治共识的产生，维持和衰落的影响的问题。本论文发现，由于在当今情况下无法访问官僚程序，政治角色和政府掌握的信息，因此关于“经验界”的研究最适合用于历史案例研究。但是，分析人员确实可以直接使用政府发布信息的“证据内容”。可以定性地分析这些数据的内在含义和内在涵义。在1950年至1965年的三个冷战案例研究中对理论和方法进行了检验。以上的主要和次要资料用于构建每个案例研究的历史背景，然后是官方文字材料的方法学渲染。在评估部分，会产生有关意识形态和情境材料相结合的反馈问题，以质疑“专家”透明性和完整性的程度。结论是对本研究框架在当代美国外交政策制定过程分析中的适用性进行了评估。本论文采用了意识形态和情境信息之间的理论二分法，并在专家系统中使用了一种称为“知识映射”的人工智能方法。施工。该方法基于类似于总统语法的决策树状渲染成类似于语义语法网络的独立和从属文本节点的层次结构。像那些构建专家系统的人一样，政治学家也关心完全建模专家的分析推理（透明度）和他们的问题解决方案（完整性）中的逻辑步骤。采用反馈机制有助于这一过程。与专家系统的参与者不同，政治操作人员不被视为易于访问的协作者，而是非合作对象，他们通过操纵目标群体的意识形态倾向，试图在单个问题的决策上建立关键的支持者群体。利用政府保密性和行政特权可以帮助总统政府执行其偏爱的政策，同时限制对其他外交政策选择的辩论范围。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hennessy, David James.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.;Artificial Intelligence.;History United States.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 492 p.
  • 总页数 492
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号