• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Mental health specialty preference in occupational therapy: Using the theory of work adjustment to examine the influence of values, reinforcers and job satisfaction upon the level II fieldwork affiliation
【24h】

Mental health specialty preference in occupational therapy: Using the theory of work adjustment to examine the influence of values, reinforcers and job satisfaction upon the level II fieldwork affiliation

机译：在职业治疗中对心理健康专业的偏爱：使用工作调整理论来检验价值观，强化力量和工作满意度对二级现场工作隶属关系的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research used the theory of work adjustment (Lofquist & Dawis, 1984) to examine the influence of satisfaction and congruence on specialty preference of mental health in occupational therapy. Students were assessed on each fieldwork II experience in mental health and physical disability on the variables of satisfaction using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) and measures of congruence based on values (MIQ-Minnesota Importance Questionnaire) and the assessment of reinforcers in the fieldwork environment (MJDQ-Minnesota Job Description Questionnaire). Specialty preference option was indicated as: mental health, physical disability or undecided.;The sample consisted of 380 students from 16 occupational therapy programs in the northeastern United States. A repeated measures design was employed with data collected longitudinally prior to level II fieldwork and at the midterm of the mental health and physical disability fieldwork experience. Data analysis used independent t-tests of difference scores on the MSQ which revealed significantly higher levels of general satisfaction (80.3) for the sample choosing mental health (p $<$.0005). Twelve percent indicated a preference for work in mental health. Ratings were at the satisfied level for the mental health fieldwork experience for those choosing the mental health specialty. This group rated the physical disability fieldwork (63.7) as "neither satisfied or dissatisfied". For those choosing physical disability, satisfaction ratings were similar for each experience and were in the "neither satisfied or dissatisfied" range. Levels of congruence did not predict specialty preference.;Only 43% of those preferring mental health had initially selected that area, while 78% of those designating a physical disability preference decided prior to fieldwork. Another finding was that a third of the mental health sample received scholarships with a work commitment upon graduation. In general, both groups rated supervision higher in the mental health fieldwork. Occupational therapy educational programs need to study the extent to which students enter the curriculum already sure of their practice preference and consider recruitment strategies to attract those interested in mental health. Furthermore, it is critical to require students to have level II fieldwork in mental health as over half of those selecting it did so after the clinical exposure.
机译：这项研究使用工作调整理论（Lofquist＆Dawis，1984）来检验满意度和一致性对职业治疗中心理健康专业偏好的影响。使用明尼苏达州满意度调查表（MSQ）对学生在心理健康和身体残疾方面的每一次实地调查II体验进行满意度评估，并根据值进行同等度量（MIQ-Minnesota重要问卷），并在实地工作环境中评估加固人员，对学生进行评估（MJDQ-明尼苏达州工作描述问卷）。专业偏爱选项表示为：精神健康，身体残疾或未定。；该样本包括来自美国东北部16个职业治疗计划的380名学生。在II级实地调查之前以及在心理健康和身体残疾实地调查经验的中期，采用了重复测量的设计，并纵向收集了数据。数据分析在MSQ上使用差异得分的独立t检验，发现选择心理健康的样本的总体满意度（80.3）显着提高（p $ <。0005）。百分之十二的人表示偏爱心理健康工作。对于那些选择心理健康专业的人，其心理健康实地工作经验的满意度处于满意水平。该小组将身体残疾实地调查（63.7）评为“既不满意也不满意”。对于那些选择肢体残疾的人，每个经历的满意度都相似，并且都在“既不满意也不满意”的范围内。一致性水平不能预测专业偏好。仅43％的偏爱心理健康者最初选择了该地区，而指定身体残疾偏好的人中有78％在实地调查之前就决定了。另一个发现是，三分之一的心理健康样本获得了奖学金，并在毕业后做出了工作承诺。总体而言，两组在心理健康实地调查中对监督的评价都较高。职业疗法教育计划需要研究学生进入课程的程度，已经确定了他们的实践偏爱，并考虑了招募策略以吸引对心理健康感兴趣的人。此外，至关重要的是要求学生进行心理健康II级实地调查，因为超过一半的学生选择在接受临床暴露后才这样做。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scott, Anne C. Hiller.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 Occupational safety.;Occupational psychology.;Health Sciences Education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 355 p.
  • 总页数 355
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号