• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Paul's use of part-whole argument of to sympheron in 1 Corinthians.
【24h】

Paul's use of part-whole argument of to sympheron in 1 Corinthians.

机译：保罗在哥林多前书中对sympheron的部分整体论证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation investigates Paul's use in 1 Corinthians of a part-whole rhetoric of "the common advantage" (to sympheron). A part-whole rhetoric is a traditional Greco-Roman ethical discourse in which the community is the context of ethical reasoning, and members seek the advantage of the whole. Paul employs the ethic of to sympheron to combat the improper exercise of to idion (private advantage) and to advance his ministry by overcoming socio-economic, ethnic, and gender differences that threaten his ekklesiai (churches).;Although classical and Pauline scholars have taken notice of to sympheron, its contexts and functions remain insufficiently mapped. Chapters 1 to 4, therefore, demonstrate from Greco-Roman writings that to sympheron is rooted in part-whole relationship ethics. In such contexts, to sympheron becomes a criterion for addressing issues such as conduct, division, and conflict. The dissertation probes the complex relationship between to sympheron, to idion (private advantage), and to dikaion (justice) more deeply than prior scholarship. To ease tensions between them, early moral philosophers sometimes invoked a rhetoric of the human body. Philosophers observed hierarchy in the human body, in the universe, and in social structures. When hierarchical dynamics are abused---such as private advantage overriding common advantage---discord and injustice result. For Paul, however, the body should operate organically, without tension between to idion and to sympheron. Thus the body metaphor promotes community reciprocity and demonstrates the mutual benefit of working for the whole.;Chapters 5 and 6 argue that Paul's use of to sympheron in 1 Corinthians is consistent with Greco-Roman usage in certain particulars. Yet in Paul's paradigm the community is not simply a body, but "the body of Christ." Paul uses the Cross and agape (love) as alternative and powerful ways to understand and express an ethic of seeking the good of the community. Paul further develops the advantage ("salvation") of the gospel that overcomes previously-existing social divisions toward a community of "called ones." Paul's goal for to sympheron is not simply concord among Corinthian believers but also taking the gospel beyond them, for he believes many will gravitate to communities rooted in the ethic of to sympheron.
机译：本文研究了保罗在哥林多前书中对“共​​同利益”（对交响曲调）的部分修辞的使用。整体说辞是传统的希腊罗马道德话语，其中社区是道德推理的背景，而成员则寻求整体优势。保罗运用“共产主义”的道德观来打击对“民族主义”（私人利益）的不当使用，并克服社会经济，种族和性别差异，这威胁了他的ekklesiai（教会）。注意到sympheron，其上下文和功能仍然映射不充分。因此，从第1章到第4章，从希腊罗马著作中证明，交际素根植于部分整体关系伦理学中。在这样的背景下，交配器成为解决诸如行为，分裂和冲突之类的标准。相对于先前的研究，本文更深入地探讨了与交际素，同构关系（私人利益）和对立论（正义）之间的复杂关系。为了缓解他们之间的紧张关系，早期的道德哲学家有时援引人体的言论。哲学家观察了人体，宇宙和社会结构中的等级制度。当滥用等级制动力时（例如私人利益凌驾于共同利益之上），就会导致不一致和不公正。但是，对于保罗来说，身体应该有机地运转，而在幻想和交际之间不需紧张。因此，身体的隐喻促进了社区的互惠，并显示了为整体工作的共同利益。第5章和第6章认为，保罗在哥林多一书中对交配子的使用与希腊罗马语在某些方面的用法是一致的。然而，在保罗的范例中，社区不仅仅是一个身体，而是“基督的身体”。保罗将“十字架”和“ agape”（爱）作为替代和强大的方式来理解和表达寻求社区利益的道德观。保罗进一步发展了福音的优势（“得救”），该优势克服了先前存在的朝向“被称为者”社区的社会分裂。保罗的交往目标不仅是在哥林多信徒之间达成和解，而且还超越了他们的福音，因为他相信许多人会倾向于植根于交际伦理的社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chang, Kei Eun.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.;Philosophy.;Religion Biblical Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 382 p.
  • 总页数 382
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号