• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Ethnic conflict, sovereignty, and humanitarian intervention: Internationalization of domestic conflict and systems change in international relations.
【24h】

Ethnic conflict, sovereignty, and humanitarian intervention: Internationalization of domestic conflict and systems change in international relations.

机译：种族冲突，主权和人道主义干预：国内冲突的国际化和国际关系中的制度发生了变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation deals with the international community's response to ethnic and other internal conflict in the post-Cold War period, and its impact on the structure of the international system. In short, this study pursues the question if, as an effective move toward global governance in security relations, the principles of state sovereignty and non-intervention have been undermined by post-Cold War international humanitarian intervention, in a process supported, and even driven, by major powers whose traditional emphasis on narrowly defined national interest has been broadened to effectively address issues of global peace and security. These issues are analyzed with respect to Russian, German and American foreign policy decisionmaking on international intervention in intercommunal crises in places such as Iraq, the former Yugoslavia and Somalia.; In a nutshell, the findings suggest a very limited life for effective UN-sponsored global responses to substate, intercommunal, conflict, which, for many, appeared to have been set in motion by UN Secretary-General Boutros-Ghali's suggestions in his 1992 An Agenda for Peace and the concurrent proliferation of UN involvement in various civil conflicts. Notably, peacekeeping operations are pursued by major states only as long as they fulfil their particular interests in defending national security and in establishing their international positions vis-a-vis other state actors, and as long as the economic, political and human costs associated with such involvement do not outweigh the strategic interests pursued by participation. Current and future United Nations peacekeeping activities will most likely not lead to a restructured international system, with its potentially dramatic implications for change in international relations theory and interpretations of international law. If global organizations desire to live up to their universalist and humanitarian principles, future internal conflict will have to be "sold" to potential contributors to peacekeeping operations in reference to potential cross-border security threats for neighbouring nations--in the form of military spill-over, of refugees, of market depletion, of environmental impacts and other short and long-term security risks.
机译：本文论述了冷战后国际社会对种族冲突和其他内部冲突的反应及其对国际体系结构的影响。简而言之，本研究探讨的问题是，作为朝着安全关系中全球治理的有效方向迈进，冷战后国际人道主义干预是否破坏了国家主权和不干预原则，而这一过程得到了支持甚至推动。的大国，其传统强调狭义国家利益的方式已经扩大，以有效解决全球和平与安全问题。对这些问题的分析是针对俄罗斯，德国和美国在国际干预伊拉克，前南斯拉夫和索马里等地区的国际间危机方面的外交政策决策。简而言之，调查结果表明，由联合国发起的对次国家，族际间，冲突的有效全球响应的有效生命期非常有限，对于许多人来说，这似乎是联合国秘书长布特罗斯-加利在其1992年《联合国国际反恐公约》中提出的。 《和平纲领》和联合国同时参与各种内战的扩散。值得注意的是，只有在维护国家安全和相对于其他国家行为体建立国际地位的特定利益，以及与之相关的经济，政治和人力成本的前提下，主要国家才会进行维持和平行动这种参与不超过参与所追求的战略利益。当前和未来的联合国维持和平活动很可能不会导致国际体系的改组，其对国际关系理论和国际法解释的变化可能具有重大影响。如果全球组织希望遵守其普遍主义原则和人道主义原则，则未来的内部冲突将不得不“出售”给维持和平行动的潜在捐助者，并考虑到邻国以军事溢出的形式对邻国的潜在跨界安全威胁-难民，市场消耗，环境影响以及其他短期和长期安全风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schnabel, Albrecht.;

  • 作者单位

    Queen's University at Kingston (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Queen's University at Kingston (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 404 p.
  • 总页数 404
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号