• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Urban bias and the rural planner in the developed world.
【24h】

Urban bias and the rural planner in the developed world.

机译：发达国家的城市偏见和农村计划者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Urban bias has long been considered to be a problem in Third World development. Two interpretations of the urban bias theory are considered to explain urban bias and how it is exhibited in traditional rural planning methodology. Despite arguments that the nature of urban bias precludes its existence in developed nations, it has been found in various relationships between urban and rural regions. This thesis shows that an urban bias exists in planning in developed nations, including Canada.;Planning has traditionally had an urban focus through policy and training which has led to the development of urban bias in the approach to rural environments. These biases are illustrated through the work of rural planning theorists from Great Britain, the United States and Canada. Traditionally listed as 'problems in rural planning', these biases are found to exist in many real issues which are common among these three countries. Some of the effects of urban bias on rural planning and rural communities are used to illustrate why it is not an acceptable element of rural planning.;So to further understand the issues of and solutions for urban bias, two research methods, Rapid Rural Appraisal and Participatory Rural Appraisal are explained. These methods are then considered in relation to the traditional techniques of rural planning. In an effort to understand how rural planning can be more 'rurally' conscious, suggestions are offered for alternative planning techniques. These specific techniques were chosen since they addressed issues and problems which have been identified with urban bias.;Improving rural planning education is another way to approach the effects of urban bias. Proposals are made for increasing the awareness of urban bias in planning programs and for teaching residents of rural communities more about the process and value of planning.
机译：长期以来，城市偏见一直被认为是第三世界发展中的一个问题。考虑了城市偏向理论的两种解释，以解释城市偏向及其在传统农村规划方法论中的表现。尽管有人认为城市偏见的性质妨碍了它在发达国家中的存在，但已经在城乡地区之间的各种关系中发现了这一点。本论文表明，包括加拿大在内的发达国家在规划中都存在城市偏见。传统上，规划是通过政策和培训来关注城市的，这导致了农村偏向环境中城市偏见的发展。这些偏见通过英国，美国和加拿大的农村规划理论家的工作得以说明。传统上，这些偏见被列为“农村规划中的问题”，这在这三个国家之间共同存在的许多实际问题中都存在。城市偏见对农村规划和农村社区的一些影响被用来说明为什么它不是农村规划的可接受因素。因此，为了进一步了解城市偏见的问题和解决方案，两种研究方法是农村快速评估和解释了参与式农村评估。然后将这些方法与乡村规划的传统技术结合起来考虑。为了了解农村规划如何更加“具有乡村意识”，提出了有关替代规划技术的建议。选择这些特定的技术是因为它们解决了已经被城市偏见识别出的问题和问题。改善农村计划教育是解决城市偏见影响的另一种方法。提出了一些建议，以提高人们对规划方案中城市偏见的认识，并向农村社区的居民传授更多有关规划过程和价值的知识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sodero, Jane Margaret Fairgrieve.;

  • 作者单位

    Technical University of Nova Scotia (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Technical University of Nova Scotia (Canada).;
  • 学科 Urban planning.
  • 学位 M.U.R.P.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 95 p.
  • 总页数 95
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 耳科学、耳疾病;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号