• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Influences and constraints on American alliance politics: The case United States alliances in the Middle East.
【24h】

Influences and constraints on American alliance politics: The case United States alliances in the Middle East.

机译：对美国同盟政治的影响和制约：以美国在中东的同盟为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation examines the formation, implementation, and repercussions of American alliances in the Middle East. The cases studied are Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. The hypothesis is that as strategic issues (political, economic, and military) become the focal point of the alliance, there is a decrease in American influence over the regional ally. This results from the alliance's perceived value as a strategic asset by American policy makers, as well as the growth of American domestic political and economic interests around the alliance. The dissertation supports the validity of the political science literature on alliances which argues that alliances can be detrimental to the foreign policy goals of large powers as their smaller allies are able to manipulate them.;The Iranian case focuses on the period in which Iran became a primary American ally in the third world, during the Nixon, Ford, and Carter Administrations, 1968-1978. The Israeli case focuses on the establishment of the strategic relationship during the Johnson Presidency and its subsequent development through the Reagan Administration, 1963-1988. The Saudi case emphasizes the period when Riyadh progressed from being the junior partner of the US twin pillar policy in the region to subsequently replacing Iran as one of America's primary allies in the Middle East, 1975-1988.;This dissertation supports the validity of the theories of alliances that emphasize the costs incurred by the larger power in these relationships due to the growth of reverse leverage by the smaller power. In accomplishing this the dissertation also more clearly defines the correlation between the strategic and domestic interests that govern American policy in the Middle East. The conclusion is that these relationships generally became dominated by domestic political considerations and interest groups. This resulted in America continuing to maintain alliance commitments despite changing strategic conditions.
机译：本文探讨了美国同盟在中东的形成，实施和影响。研究的案例是伊朗，以色列和沙特阿拉伯。假设是，随着战略问题（政治，经济和军事）成为联盟的焦点，美国对地区盟友的影响力正在下降。这是由于联盟将其视为美国决策者的战略资产的价值，以及联盟周围美国国内政治和经济利益的增长。这篇论文支持有关联盟的政治科学文献的有效性，该文献认为，联盟可能损害大国的外交政策目标，因为其较小的盟国能够操纵它们。尼克松，福特和卡特政府时期（1968-1978），美国是第三世界的主要美国盟友。以色列的案件侧重于在约翰逊总统任期内建立战略关系，以及随后通过里根政府（1963年至1988年）发展这种战略关系。沙特案强调了利雅得从1975年至1988年成为美国在该地区的美国双塔政策的小伙伴到后来取代伊朗成为美国在中东的主要盟友之一的时期。联盟理论强调了较大关系中由于较大实力导致的成本损失，这是由于较小实力导致的反向杠杆增长。为了实现这一目标，论文还更加明确地定义了控制美国在中东政策的战略利益与国内利益之间的相关性。结论是，这些关系通常被国内政治考虑和利益集团所支配。这导致美国在不断变化的战略条件下继续保持联盟承诺。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miglietta, John Peter.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 International law.;Middle Eastern history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 779 p.
  • 总页数 779
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号