• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of touchscreen and physical keyboard with nomadic text entry.
【24h】

Comparison of touchscreen and physical keyboard with nomadic text entry.

机译：带有游牧文字输入的触摸屏和物理键盘的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many research projects have been conducted to compare standing text entry with nomadic text entry. Other research projects have compared the input types of touchscreen and physical keyboards while texting. There is few literature that compares the two inputs types during a standing and nomadic text entry. This research was conducted to investigate the differences in error rate and characters per minute for both input types during both text entry conditions. To investigate these differences two devices were used, the iPhone 4 and the Blackberry Curve 9350, to type a phrase during both a standing and walking condition. Both characters per minute and error rate were analyzed. The investigation showed that there were no significant difference in error rate, but there was a significant difference in characters per minute. The touchscreen keyboard performed better in terms of characters per minutes and arguably performed better in accuracy.
机译：已经进行了许多研究项目，以比较常规文本输入和游牧文本输入。其他研究项目已经在发短信时比较了触摸屏和物理键盘的输入类型。很少有文献比较站立和游牧文本输入期间的两种输入类型。进行这项研究以调查两种文本输入条件下两种输入类型的错误率和每分钟字符数的差异。为了研究这些差异，使用了两种设备（iPhone 4和Blackberry Curve 9350）在站立和行走状态下键入短语。分析了每分钟字符数和错误率。调查表明，错误率没有显着差异，但每分钟字符数却存在显着差异。触摸屏键盘每分钟的字符数表现更好，并且准确性也可以说更好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ross, Michael Tyler.;

  • 作者单位

    Mississippi State University.;

  • 授予单位 Mississippi State University.;
  • 学科 Industrial engineering.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 55 p.
  • 总页数 55
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号