• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >State power and public R&D in Korea: A case study of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
【24h】

State power and public R&D in Korea: A case study of the Korea Institute of Science and Technology.

机译：韩国的国家权力与公共研发：以韩国科学技术学院为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Government-led R & D is a prominent characteristic of South Korean (hereafter refer to Korea) development. Korea's state-led mode of R & D and the workings of government-financed strategic R & D institutions in the past two and a half decades suggest the need for a close look at the dynamics of state power and local R & D in rapidly industrializing countries.;From a comparative policy analysis perspective, this study centered on why and how the Korean government pursued policies of strategic R & D institution-building, what are the performances of public R & D, and what constraints are there and why? These questions are examined through a case study of the Korea Institute of Science & Technology (KIST), the prototype for Korea's government-financed R & D centers for industrial technology and other think-tanks.;The central thesis of this dissertation is that policy environment variables exert a great influence on the workings of public R & D in Korea. The environment variables in this study are operationalized as Korea's bureaucratic-authoritarian political system, industrialization policies, and global systems of technology transfer and vertical production arrangements.;The KIST case affirms that local industry's choice of technology has been affected by the government's industrialization policies of export-promotion and technology transfer, as well as TNC power over the international circulation of technology. This situation has contributed to weakening KIST-industry linkage. President Park Chung-Hee empowered scientists to accomplish his regime's "fundamental policy" goal of industrialization, and also to enhance his political legitimacy in domestic politics. This certainly was an important latent function of public R & D in Korea. Presidential power (both overt and implied) was involved in resolving conflicts of interest which arose between KIST-developed technology vis-a-vis TNC technology, and functioned as leverage against TNCs to protect domestic R & D. The nature of government intervention in R & D in this study clearly indicates that the Korean model of government intervention in R & D goes beyond "promotional" to being "directive" in nature.
机译：政府主导的研发是韩国（以下简称韩国）发展的显着特征。在过去的两年半中，韩国以国家为主导的研发模式以及政府资助的战略研发机构的运作表明，有必要仔细研究快速工业化过程中国家权力和地方研发的动态从比较政策分析的角度出发，本研究的重点是韩国政府为何以及如何奉行战略性R＆D制度建设政策，公共R＆D的绩效如何，存在哪些制约因素，为什么？通过韩国科学技术研究院（KIST）的案例研究对这些问题进行了研究，韩国科学技术研究院是韩国政府资助的工业技术和其他智囊团研发中心的原型。本论文的中心论点是政策环境变量对韩国的公共研发工作有很大影响。本研究中的环境变量可用于韩国的官僚专制政治制度，工业化政策以及全球技术转让和垂直生产安排制度。KIST案确认，韩国政府的工业化政策影响了当地产业的技术选择。出口促进和技术转让，以及跨国公司对国际技术流通的控制权。这种情况导致削弱了KIST与产业的联系。朴正熙总统授权科学家实现其政权实现工业化的“基本政策”目标，并增强其在国内政治中的政治合法性。这无疑是韩国公共研发的重要潜在功能。总统权力（公开和暗含）参与解决了KIST开发的技术与TNC技术之间的利益冲突，并起到了抵制TNC的作用，以保护国内研发。政府对R的干预的性质研究中的研发明确表明，韩国政府对研发的干预模式本质上已从“促销”转变为“指导”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yoon, Bang-Soon Launius.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Hawai'i at Manoa.;

  • 授予单位 University of Hawai'i at Manoa.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science International Law and Relations.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1992
  • 页码 383 p.
  • 总页数 383
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号