• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Interrelation between religious and political power under New Order Indonesia.
【24h】

Interrelation between religious and political power under New Order Indonesia.

机译：新秩序印度尼西亚下的宗教和政治权力之间的相互关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study is to analyze the interrelationship of religious and political power in the New Order government of Indonesia. This study is focused on two areas of religio-political power: power relations between the government and religious associations, and the government's policies on religions. Hence this study tries to answer two related questions: Are the eight religious associations in Indonesia dependent upon the government for their survival and functioning? And, do the state and religions influence each other?;Two conclusions can be drawn from this study. Most religious associations in Indonesia are relatively independent from the government so that the system of religious interest representation resembles more the pluralistic than the corporatistic model. This is explained by relevance to the religiously pluralistic nature of Indonesian society. The variety of well-rooted religions in Indonesia results in a relatively pluralist religious interest representation.;The second conclusion is that interpenetration between the state and religions has occurred on the six criteria used in this study, so that the state in Indonesia is more accurately categorized as a religiously accommodating state than as a secular state. This religiously accommodating state is a product of four interrelated factors: a religiously pluralistic society, pluralist system of religious interest representation, the historical role of the state in religious affairs, and the design for the nation-state laid down by the 1945 Constitution. However, contrary to its intention not to get involved in the internal matters of religion, the government in its attempt to accommodate the interests of the Islamic community has occasionally interpreted religious teaching, has restricted religious propagation, and has placed Islam as the first among equals.;The first question is analyzed by using the interest representation model as conceptual framework. The second question is analyzed by using a typology of state and religion relations. This empirical study utilizes a variety of documents published by the government and by religious associations in order to answer these two questions. In addition, information published in newspapers, magazines, and journals is used.
机译：本研究的目的是分析印度尼西亚新秩序政府中宗教和政治权力的相互关系。这项研究的重点是宗教政治权力的两个领域：政府与宗教团体之间的权力关系，以及政府的宗教政策。因此，本研究试图回答两个相关的问题：印度尼西亚的八个宗教协会的生存和功能是否取决于政府？并且，国家和宗教会相互影响吗？；从这项研究中可以得出两个结论。印度尼西亚的大多数宗教团体相对独立于政府，因此宗教利益代表制与团体模式相比更像是多元化的。这可以通过与印尼社会的宗教多元性相关来解释。印度尼西亚根深蒂固的宗教的多样性导致了相对多元的宗教利益代表。第二个结论是，本研究使用的六个标准是国家与宗教之间的相互渗透，因此，印度尼西亚的国家更加准确被归类为宗教容纳状态而非世俗状态。这个具有宗教适应性的国家是四个相互联系的因素的产物：一个宗教多元化的社会，宗教利益代表的多元化体系，国家在宗教事务中的历史作用以及1945年《宪法》规定的民族国家的设计。但是，与不参与宗教内部事务的意图相反，政府在努力满足伊斯兰社区利益的过程中偶尔解释了宗教教义，限制了宗教传播，并将伊斯兰教派列为平等领域的第一位。通过使用利益表示模型作为概念框架来分析第一个问题。通过使用国家和宗教关系的类型学来分析第二个问题。这项实证研究利用了政府和宗教团体发布的各种文献来回答这两个问题。此外，还使用报纸，杂志和期刊上发布的信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Surbakti, Ramlan Agustinus.;

  • 作者单位

    Northern Illinois University.;

  • 授予单位 Northern Illinois University.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 464 p.
  • 总页数 464
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号