首页> 外文学位 >The militarized social democracy and racism: The relationships between militarism, racism and social welfare policy in the United States.
【24h】

The militarized social democracy and racism: The relationships between militarism, racism and social welfare policy in the United States.

机译:军事化的社会民主与种族主义:美国的军事主义,种族主义与社会福利政策之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation focuses on two sets of issues relating to the US' post-World War II political-economic development. First, it analyzes the dynamic relationships between the state and social movements. Second, it examines the interrelationships between the US' militarism, racism and social welfare policies.;The dissertation's analyses show that social movements--i.e., the black liberation and antiwar movements in the 1960s and early 1970s, the New Right in the late 1970s and early 1980s--were conditioned by state policies embodied in the budget, and that these popular movements, in turn, created or restructured components of the budget. Thus, a full explanation of the development of either states or social movements requires an understanding of the dynamic relationships between them.;The study's analyses also demonstrate that the military budget constituted a perverse social democracy and had important ramifications for social welfare policy and the socio-economic status of African-Americans. By underwriting the income security and social services needs of broad segments of the American population, this "militarized social democracy" undermined crucial popular support for viable social democratic programs, especially an expanded welfare state. Moreover, the militarized social democracy disproportionately benefited white Americans, and thereby contributed to the continued economic and social subordination of African-Americans. Further, in combination with other structural barriers to their full participation in American life, blacks' exclusion from the militarized social democracy made them more dependent than whites on social welfare programs for their survival, and also made meaningful improvements in their socio-economic status contingent on the establishment of viable social democratic programs. However, blacks' reliance on state programs fueled whites' anti-welfarism and racism, thereby further undercutting support for the social democratic agenda. Thus, military spending undermined the development of the welfare state and perpetuated racial inequities in the US.;The study is a historical sociological analysis that relies primarily on the qualitative analysis of documents and reports of Executive departments and agencies and the Congress, studies by specialized issue organizations, the business and popular presses, and the pertinent sociological and related secondary literatures. It also employs quantitative analysis of Senate voting trends.
机译:本文着眼于与美国第二次世界大战后政治经济发展有关的两套问题。首先,它分析了国家与社会运动之间的动态关系。其次,它考察了美国军国主义,种族主义和社会福利政策之间的相互关系。论文的分析表明,社会运动,即1960年代和1970年代初期的黑人解放和反战运动,是1970年代后期的新权利。和1980年代初期-受预算中体现的国家政策的制约,而这些受欢迎的运动又反过来创造或调整了预算的组成部分。因此,要全面解释国家或社会运动的发展,就需要了解它们之间的动态关系。研究还表明,军事预算构成了有害的社会民主,对社会福利政策和社会产生了重要影响。 -非裔美国人的经济地位。通过支持广大美国人的收入保障和社会服务需求,这种“军事化的社会民主主义”破坏了民众对可行的社会民主计划,特别是扩大的福利国家的关键支持。此外,军事化的社会民主主义给白人带来了不成比例的好处,从而为非裔美国人的持续经济和社会从属做出了贡献。此外,与其他阻碍其充分参与美国生活的结构性障碍相结合,黑人被排除在军事化的社会民主制度之外,使他们比白人更依赖于社会福利计划以维持生存,并在很大程度上改善了其社会经济地位的状况。建立可行的社会民主计划。但是,黑人对国家计划的依赖助长了白人的反福利主义和种族主义,从而进一步削弱了对社会民主议程的支持。因此,军事支出破坏了美国福利国家的发展和长期存在的种族不平等现象。该研究是一种历史社会学分析,主要依靠对行政部门和机关以及国会的文件和报告进行定性分析,发行组织,商业和大众媒体,以及相关的社会学和相关二级文献。它还采用了参议院投票趋势的定量分析。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hardin, Bristow.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Cruz.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Cruz.;
  • 学科 Social structure.;American studies.;Public administration.;Public policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 439 p.
  • 总页数 439
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号