• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Government-industry relations and industrial crises: A comparative analysis of the steel and auto industries in Britain and France in the 1980s.
【24h】

Government-industry relations and industrial crises: A comparative analysis of the steel and auto industries in Britain and France in the 1980s.

机译：政府与行业的关系和工业危机：1980年代英国和法国的钢铁和汽车工业的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The 1980s were a turbulent time for west European manufacturers. New technologies were developed, while market shares fell and new competitors arose. Governments became involved in helping firms to adapt, even to survive.; The British and French governments were embroiled in intense national debates about the use of nationalisation, privatisation, and trade and industry policies, to revitalise key industries such as auto and steel production. The Mitterrand and Thatcher governments espoused radically different ideologies towards government-industry relations.; However, at the level of individual firms the policies adopted, and the ways in which they were implemented, were remarkably similar across nations and industries. The key to this similarity was each firm's need to raise enormous sums of money to finance restructuring.; The governments' specific relations with four key firms are analysed--British Steel, Usinor-Sacilor, Peugeot and British Leyland. In each case, regardless of ideology and of formal ownership, the focus was on the firms' financial needs. The governments backed the firms' restructuring plans, rescued the near-bankrupt, assisted the small producers in each sector and encouraged private investment.; Once we place the financing of industry at the centre of government-industry relations analysis, a number of conclusions become apparent. First, the policy process was highly exclusive, whatever the political context involved.; Second, the particular degree and form of the governments' involvement with each firm depended primarily on the firm's financial structure, and in particular on the kinds of capital to which the firm had access.; Third, how a government structures and intervenes in financial markets is a critical component of contemporary industrial policies. Analysis of government-industry relations must focus on how companies get their financing, not just on formal ownership.; Finally, the impact of the European Community's Project '92 is extensive, but national patterns of financial regulation are eroding slowly and will not disappear in 1992. National governments will continue to play a significant role in shaping the financial environment of private and state-owned industries.
机译：对于西欧制造商而言，1980年代是动荡的时期。在开发新技术的同时，市场份额下降了，而新的竞争对手也出现了。政府参与了帮助企业适应甚至生存的活动。英国和法国政府卷入了关于使用国有化，私有化以及贸易和工业政策来振兴汽车和钢铁生产等关键行业的激烈的全国性辩论。密特朗（Mitterrand）和撒切尔（Thatcher）两国政府在政企关系方面拥护根本不同的意识形态。但是，在各个公司的层面上，所采用的政策以及实施这些政策的方式在各个国家和行业之间都非常相似。这种相似性的关键是每个公司都需要筹集大量资金来进行重组。分析了政府与四家主要公司的具体关系-英国钢铁，Usinor-Sacilor，标致和英国Leyland。在每种情况下，无论意识形态和正式所有权如何，重点都放在公司的财务需求上。政府支持企业的重组计划，挽救了濒临破产的企业，为各个部门的小生产者提供了援助，并鼓励私人投资。一旦将工业融资置于政府与行业关系分析的中心，就会得出许多结论。首先，无论涉及何种政治背景，政策过程都是高度排他的。其次，政府参与每家公司的具体程度和形式主要取决于公司的财务结构，尤其取决于公司获得的资本种类。第三，政府如何组织和干预金融市场是当代产业政策的重要组成部分。对政府与产业关系的分析必须关注公司如何获得融资，而不仅仅是正式所有权。最后，欧洲共同体'92计划的影响是广泛的，但是国家的金融监管模式正在慢慢侵蚀，并且在1992年不会消失。各国政府将继续在塑造私人和国有金融环境中发挥重要作用。行业。

著录项

  • 作者

    Marklew, Victoria.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1991
  • 页码 360 p.
  • 总页数 360
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号