• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >An analysis of reported State and Federal Appellate Court cases occurring from 1960 to 1988 which define the authority of board of trustees and school officials to make rules and regulations governing public school students.
【24h】

An analysis of reported State and Federal Appellate Court cases occurring from 1960 to 1988 which define the authority of board of trustees and school officials to make rules and regulations governing public school students.

机译：对1960年至1988年发生的州和联邦上诉法院举报案件进行的分析，这些案件定义了董事会和学校官员制定管理公立学校学生的规章制度的权限。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyze reported State and Federal Appellate Court cases occurring from 1960 to 1988 which define the authority of boards of trustees and school officials to make rules and regulations governing public school students in order to assist school authorities in understanding the impact and ramifications of court decisions affecting public education.;Selected findings. There were very few appellate cases reported on the subject of the authority of boards of trustees and school officials to make rules and regulations governing students in the early 1960s. From the mid-1960s to mid-1970s there was a significant rise of reported appellate cases evidencing an explosion of challenges to school rules and regulations. From the mid-1970s to the present, the number of reported appellate cases has declined drastically, which seems to signify that the courts have more narrowly defined, and are settling, the law in the area of school rules and regulations.;Selected conclusions. School trustees and officials derive authority to make rules and regulations from their state constitutions and legislatures. The courts have basically held that school authorities have wide discretion in making and enforcing school rules and regulations so long as the rule or regulation is reasonable. As such, it is the desire and policy of the courts to uphold the validity of school rules and regulations, unless the rule or regulation violates protected constitutional rights or public laws. Accordingly, the courts have addressed the validity of numerous school rules and regulations common to most school districts. Of particular importance for this study were court decisions on rules and regulations in the areas of: student discipline, recreational and social activities, interscholastic activities, secret clubs, student free speech and free press, and student searches and seizures.;Selected recommendations. In order to effectively administer public schools, school trustees and school officials should be familiar with the principles of law which govern their actions. As a supplement to this study, recommended areas for further study include: (1) An analysis and comparison of historical social trends and their relationship to appellate court rulings; (2) Determining the level of knowledge school authorities have regarding their legal rights and obligations in controlling public school students; (3) Further studies updating this dissertation because of continuing rulings by appellate courts.;Procedure. The historical method of research was used to study reported Federal and State Appellate Court cases during the period 1960 to 1988 in order to categorize, synthesize, document, and interpret their influences on boards of trustees and school officials to make and enforce rules and regulations governing public school students.
机译：目的。这项研究的目的是分析1960年至1988年间报告的州和联邦上诉法院案件，这些案件定义了受托人委员会和学校官员制定管理公立学校学生的规章制度的权力，以帮助学校当局了解其影响。以及影响公共教育的法院裁决的后果。在1960年代初，很少有关于上诉委员会和学校官员制定规章制度的上诉案件。从1960年代中期到1970年代中期，报告的上诉案件显着增加，证明对学校规章制度的挑战激增。从1970年代中期到现在，已报告的上诉案件数量急剧下降，这似乎表明法院在学校规章制度方面对法律的定义更为狭窄，正在解决。学校受托人和官员有权根据其州宪法和立法制定规章制度。法院基本上认为，只要学校的规章制度合理，学校当局在制定和执行学校规章制度方面具有广泛的酌处权。因此，除非学校的规章制度违反了受保护的宪法权利或公法，否则法院的意愿和政策就是坚持学校规章制度的有效性。因此，法院已经解决了大多数学区通用的许多学校规章制度的有效性。对于这项研究特别重要的是法院在以下方面的规则和法规方面的决定：学生纪律，娱乐和社交活动，校际活动，秘密俱乐部，学生言论自由和新闻自由以及学生搜查和扣押。为了有效地管理公立学校，学校受托人和学校官员应熟悉管辖其行为的法律原则。作为这项研究的补充，建议进一步研究的领域包括：（1）对历史社会趋势及其与上诉法院裁决的关系进行分析和比较； （2）确定学校当局对控制公立学校学生的合法权利和义务的了解程度； （3）由于上诉法院的持续裁决，对本论文进行了进一步的研究。历史研究方法用于研究1960年至1988年期间报告的联邦和州上诉法院案件，以便对其进行分类，综合，记录和解释其对受托人董事会和学校官员的影响，以制定和执行有关公立学校的学生。

著录项

  • 作者

    Labrucherie, Mary Louise.;

  • 作者单位

    University of La Verne.;

  • 授予单位 University of La Verne.;
  • 学科 Law.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1990
  • 页码 182 p.
  • 总页数 182
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物医学（兽医学）;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号