• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparative analysis of frequently and infrequently cited documents in information science by functions performed and citation frequency of citing documents.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of frequently and infrequently cited documents in information science by functions performed and citation frequency of citing documents.

机译：通过执行的功能和引用文献的引用频率，对信息科学中频繁引用和不频繁引用的文献进行比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study looks for factors which may explain frequency and nature of use of documents in citing document texts. The main question is whether groups of frequently and infrequently cited papers are used for different functions by authors who use them. In addition the research explores whether the citing papers are used with different frequencies, whether authors from different disciplines differ in their functional uses of documents, whether there is a difference in the citation frequency distributions and multiple mentions of the two groups of papers over time and whether journals in which both groups of documents are used differ by their frequencies of use.; Frequently and infrequently cited articles were identified from articles published in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science in 1972, 1973, and 1974. The uses of the documents in 417 citing contexts were examined by classification taxonomies which had been developed by Murugesan and Moravcsik, Peritz, Chubin and Moitra, and Spiegel-Rosing.; The questions, hypotheses, and findings were related to citing models derived from cognitive and social theories of communication. The data were analyzed using chi square and t-test.; The conclusions are as follows: (1) Frequently and infrequently cited documents are not used for significantly different functions, (2) Authors from different disciplines appear to use cited documents for different functions, (3) There is a tendency toward a positive relationship between the citation levels of cited and citing articles, (4) Frequently cited articles appear more tightly linked (essential) than infrequently cited documents to their citing documents, (5) While frequently cited articles are not judged more useful than infrequently cited articles initially, over time differences in the patterns and intensity of use develop, and (6) While the two groups of articles are cited by the same journals, the frequency with which the articles are used in the top citing journals significantly differs. The analysis suggests that a social communications model is appropriate for citing of frequently cited papers and a cognitive communications model is appropriate for citing of infrequently cited papers.
机译：这项研究寻找可以解释引用文件文本时使用文件的频率和性质的因素。主要问题是使用频繁或不频繁引用的论文组是否被使用它们的作者用于不同的功能。此外，该研究还探讨了引用论文的使用频率是否不同，不同学科的作者在文档的功能用途上是否有所不同，引用频率的分布是否存在差异以及两组论文在一段时间内的多次提及以及使用这两组文件的期刊的使用频率是否不同？从1972年，1973年和1974年在《美国信息科学杂志》上发表的文章中发现了经常引用和不经常引用的文章。通过Murugsan和Moravcsik开发的分类分类法对417引用上下文中这些文件的使用进行了检查。 ，Peritz，Chubin和Moitra以及Spiegel-Rosing。问题，假设和调查结果与从认知和社会沟通理论衍生的引用模型有关。使用卡方检验和t检验对数据进行分析。结论如下：（1）经常使用和不经常使用的文献没有显着不同的功能；（2）来自不同学科的作者似乎将引用的文献用于不同的功能；（3）两者之间存在积极关系的趋势。 （4）与那些不经常被引用的文献相比，经常被引用的文章与他们被引用文献之间的联系更为紧密（必要）。（5）在最初，不被认为经常被引用的文章比不经常被引用的文章更有用。 （6）虽然这两类文章被同一期刊引用，但在顶级引用期刊中使用该文章的频率却存在显着差异。分析表明，社交交流模型适合于引用频繁被引用的论文，而认知交流模型适合于引用不被频繁引用的论文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号