• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >An analysis of the theoretical orientation of religious education administrators.
【24h】

An analysis of the theoretical orientation of religious education administrators.

机译：宗教教育管理者的理论取向分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Two types of religious education administrators serve the parishes of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA). The professional religious education administrator is commissioned by the ELCA, and the paraprofessional religious education administrator was noncommissioned. This study examined the theoretical orientation, skill level, preparation, and preference for alternative religious education models of religious education administrators.;Two hundred professional and two hundred paraprofessional religious education administrators comprised the sample population for this study. The survey study was guided by two research questions: (1) What is the prevailing framework adopted and applied by religious education administrators, i.e. traditional, social cultural, contemporary and social science models? (2) Are there differences between professional and paraprofessional religious education administrators in preparation for their work, their theoretical orientation, and their perception of their skill level and work?;Results of the study identified the contemporary model as the preferred religious education model. The social science model was second, followed by the social cultural and traditional models. No significant differences were found between the professional and paraprofessional religious education administrators in their preparation, theoretical orientation, and their perception of their skill level and work.
机译：两种宗教教育管理者服务于美国福音路德教会（ELCA）的教区。专业宗教教育行政管理人员由ELCA委托，非专业宗教教育行政管理人员则不受委托。本研究调查了宗教教育管理者替代宗教教育模型的理论取向，技能水平，准备和偏好。；本研究的样本人群为200名专业和200名副专业的宗教教育管理者。这项调查研究受到两个研究问题的指导：（1）宗教教育管理者采用和应用的主要框架是什么，即传统，社会文化，当代和社会科学模型？ （2）专业和准专业宗教教育管理者在准备工作，理论取向以及对技能水平和工作的理解上是否存在差异？研究结果确定当代模式是首选的宗教教育模式。其次是社会科学模式，其次是社会文化和传统模式。在专业和准专业宗教教育管理人员的准备，理论取向以及他们对技能水平和工作的看法上，没有发现显着差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Green, Dorothy A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.;Education Religious.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1989
  • 页码 205 p.
  • 总页数 205
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号