• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Expansionism at The Frick Collection: The Historic Cycle of Build, Destroy, Rebuild.
【24h】

Expansionism at The Frick Collection: The Historic Cycle of Build, Destroy, Rebuild.

机译：The Frick Collection的扩张主义：建造，销毁，重建的历史周期。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This thesis contends that if landscape architecture is not accorded status equal to that of architecture, then it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to convey significance and secure protective preservation measures. The sensibilities and protections of historic landscape preservation designations, particularly with respect to urban landmarked sites, played a critical role in the recent debate surrounding The Frick Collection in New York City. In June 2014, The Frick Collection announced plans to expand its footprint on the Upper East Side. Controversy set in almost immediately, presenting the opportunity to discuss in this thesis the evolution of an historic institution's growth in which a cycle of build, destroy and rebuild had emerged. The thesis discusses the evolving status of landscape preservation within urban centers, citing the Frick Collection example of historic landscape in direct opposition to architectural construction. Archival and scholarly materials, media reports, landmark decisions, and advocacy statements illustrate the immediacy and applicability of historic persons, architecture, decisions and designations to the present day. Understanding this historic significance of place before initiating change provides a more informed pathway to the future. The thesis concludes that historic landscape preservation can, and should, warrant the equality of stewardship and significance as held by its architectural counterpart.
机译：本文认为，如果景观建筑不具有与建筑相同的地位，那么即使不是不可能，也很难传达其意义并确保保护性的保护措施。在有关纽约市The Frick Collection的近期辩论中，历史性景观保护标志的敏感性和保护，尤其是在城市地标性建筑方面，起着至关重要的作用。 2014年6月，The Frick Collection宣布了计划扩大在上东区的足迹。争议几乎立即爆发，这提供了在本文中讨论历史性机构的发展演变的机会，其中历史性建筑的建立，破坏和重建循环已经出现。本文以Frick Collection历史建筑与建筑直接对立为例，讨论了城市中心景观保护的发展状况。档案和学术材料，媒体报道，具有里程碑意义的决定以及倡导性声明，说明了历史人物，建筑，决定和名称的即时性和适用性。在开始改变之前了解位置的历史意义为未来提供了更明智的途径。论文得出的结论是，历史性的景观保护可以而且应该保证其建筑对应物在管理和意义上的平等。

著录项

  • 作者

    Walsh, Jacquelyn M.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 Art history.;Cultural resources management.;Landscape architecture.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 213 p.
  • 总页数 213
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号