• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >THE ORIGINS OF MODERN HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS, 1822-1848: HEGEL'S PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY AND ITS CRITIQUE BY RANKE AND MARX.
【24h】

THE ORIGINS OF MODERN HISTORICAL CONSCIOUSNESS, 1822-1848: HEGEL'S PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY AND ITS CRITIQUE BY RANKE AND MARX.

机译：1822-1848年现代历史意识的起源：黑格尔的历史哲学及其对兰克和马克思的批判。

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation describes the origins of modern historical consciousness in the writings of Hegel, Ranke, and Marx between 1822 and 1848. Hegel's Philosophy of World History is shown to be the foundational work of modern historical consciousness. The criticisms of this work by Ranke and Marx establish the rival paradigms of historicism and Marxism as the two principal forms of modern historical consciousness after Hegel.; Modern historical consciousness is defined as that mode of historical thought and writing which combines universal scope with empirical content and practical (moral/political) intent. It is shown that this form of historical thought is distinct from both Enlightenment philosophical history and contemporary academic historiography. Modern historical consciousness differs from Enlightenment philosophical history in having substantial empirical content and in propounding an historical conception of human nature. It differs from contemporary academic historiography in its universal scope and in its practical/ideological effects.; The writings in which modern historical consciousness is formulated are: (1) Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, given at the University of Berlin from 1822 to 1831; (2) Ranke's theoretical critique of Hegel (in occasional writings and lectures) and his History of the Popes and German History in the Age of Reformation, all written between 1831 and 1843; and (3) Marx's critique (in various early writings) of Hegel's philosophical history, along with the early world histories which he wrote with Engels in the German Ideology and the Manifesto of the Communist Party (both between 1843 and 1848).; Chapters 1 and 2 describe Hegel's philosophical history and suggest its epistemological viability in the light of contemporary theories of historical narrative. Chapters 3 and 4 discuss the origins of historicism and Marxism, respectively, in Ranke and Marx's critiques of Hegel's world history. It is shown how these critiques accentuated different tendencies in Hegel's works, and in so doing, established the two primary approaches in contemporary historiography. Chapter 5 characterizes the origins of modern historical consciousness from 1822 to 1848 as a whole. The ontological foundations of modern historical consciousness are described, and their relation to the contemporary crisis of historical knowledge are discussed.
机译：本文以黑格尔，兰克和马克思在1822年至1848年之间的著作中描述了现代历史意识的起源。黑格尔的《世界历史哲学》被证明是现代历史意识的基础。兰格和马克思对这项工作的批评确立了历史主义和马克思主义的对立范式，作为黑格尔之后现代历史意识的两种主要形式。现代历史意识被定义​​为一种历史思维和写作方式，它将普遍范围与经验内容和实践（道德/政治）意图相结合。研究表明，这种形式的历史思想既不同于启蒙哲学史，也不同于当代学术史学。现代历史意识与启蒙哲学史不同，其具有实质性的经验内容，并提出了人性的历史观念。它与当代学术史学在通用范围和实践/意识形态效果上都不同。形成现代历史意识的著作有：（1）黑格尔关于世界历史哲学的演讲，于1822年至1831年在柏林大学发表； （2）兰克对黑格尔的理论评论（不定期地写作和演讲）以及他的《教皇历史和改革时代的德国历史》，均写于1831年至1843年之间； （3）马克思对黑格尔哲学史的批判（在各种早期著作中），以及他与恩格斯在《德国思想和共产党宣言》（1843年至1848年之间）中写给恩格斯的早期世界历史。第一章和第二章描述了黑格尔的哲学史，并根据当代历史叙事理论提出了黑格尔的认识论可行性。第三章和第四章分别讨论了兰克和马克思对黑格尔世界历史的批判中的历史主义和马克思主义的起源。可见这些批评如何强调黑格尔作品中的不同倾向，并由此确立了当代史学的两种主要方法。第五章从整体上描述了1822年至1848年现代历史意识的起源。描述了现代历史意识的本体论基础，并讨论了它们与当代历史知识危机的关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    DAHBOUR, OMAR HUSSEIN.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1987
  • 页码
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 现代史（1917年~）;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号