• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >PROBLEM REGIONS IN GREECE AND THE LOCATIONAL INCENTIVES POLICY IN MANUFACTURING (INEQUALITY, RADICAL FRAMEWORK, STATE ROLE)
【24h】

PROBLEM REGIONS IN GREECE AND THE LOCATIONAL INCENTIVES POLICY IN MANUFACTURING (INEQUALITY, RADICAL FRAMEWORK, STATE ROLE)

机译：希腊的问题区域和制造中的位置激励政策（不平等，激进的框架，国家角色）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the last two decades the regional problem has drawn considerable attention in Greece. The Greek regional problem consists of overconcentration of population and economic activity in Athens and demographic and economic decline in most of the rural areas. A variety of regional policies have been implemented in Greece but the regional problem seems persistent. The main objective of this work is to examine the nature and the causes of the regional problem in Greece and to evaluate the effectiveness and the appropriateness of the existing regional policies. The emphasis is given on the regional development incentives policy which directs manufacturing firms to the problem regions in Greece.;There are several theoretical frameworks which have been developed concerning the regional problem. These frameworks express different expectations on the process of regional inequality and the effectiveness of regional policies. In this work the radical framework is adopted for studying the regional problem and the regional policies in Greece. The basic argument of this framework is that regional inequality is inherent in the capitalist system and results from the workings of the system itself. Also, regional policies are not successful in reducing regional inequality because the private ownership of the means of production and the social composition of the capitalist state pose severe limits to the planning abilities of the state. The present work examines the above arguments of the radical framework. First, the causes of the regional problem in Greece are sought in the evolution of the capitalist mode of production. Second, the regional development incentives policy in manufacturing is evaluated. The main expectations of the radical framework that are tested in this evaluation are the following: the ability of the state to influence private investment decisions is limited; the incentives facilitated spatial processes already in progress and were not necessary for the location of the subsidized firms; the subsidized firms do no necessarily correspond to the needs and the development potential of the problem regions.
机译：在过去的二十年中，希腊的区域问题引起了相当大的关注。希腊的区域问题包括雅典人口和经济活动的过度集中以及大多数农村地区的人口和经济下降。希腊已实施了多种区域政策，但该区域问题似乎依然存在。这项工作的主要目的是研究希腊区域问题的性质和成因，并评估现有区域政策的有效性和适当性。重点放在将制造业公司引导到希腊有问题的地区的区域发展激励政策上。关于该区域问题已经开发了几种理论框架。这些框架对区域不平等进程和区域政策的有效性表达了不同的期望。在这项工作中，采用了激进的框架来研究希腊的地区问题和地区政策。该框架的基本论点是，地区不平等是资本主义制度固有的，是制度本身的运作所致。同样，区域政策在减少区域不平等方面并不成功，因为生产资料的私有制和资本主义国家的社会构成严重限制了国家的计划能力。本文研究了激进框架的上述论点。首先，在资本主义生产方式的演变中寻找希腊地区问题的起因。其次，对制造业的区域发展激励政策进行了评估。在本评估中测试的基本框架的主要期望如下：国家影响私人投资决策的能力是有限的；激励措施促进了已经在进行的空间过程，而这对于补贴公司的选址不是必需的；补贴企业不一定与问题地区的需求和发展潜力相对应。

著录项

  • 作者

    ILIOPOULOU, POLIXENI ALEXIOS.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Geography.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 437 p.
  • 总页数 437
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号