首页> 外文学位 >STATE INTERVENTION IN THE RAILROADS IN THE UNITED STATES AND BRITAIN, 1830-1985: TOWARD A THEORY OF INCREMENTAL AND STEPWISE GROWTH OF STATISM IN ADVANCED CAPITALISM (NATIONALIZATION, MARXISM, REGULATION, INSTITUTIONALISM, POLICY).
【24h】

STATE INTERVENTION IN THE RAILROADS IN THE UNITED STATES AND BRITAIN, 1830-1985: TOWARD A THEORY OF INCREMENTAL AND STEPWISE GROWTH OF STATISM IN ADVANCED CAPITALISM (NATIONALIZATION, MARXISM, REGULATION, INSTITUTIONALISM, POLICY).

机译:1830-1985年在美国和英国的铁轨上进行国家干预:建立先进资本主义(民族化,马克思主义,管制,制度主义,政策)的增量和逐步统计理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation conducts a sequential matrix analysis of the major state interventions into the rail industry in Britain and the United States between 1830 and 1985. Evidence suggests an incrementally statist trend which cannot be explained merely as a response to either capitalist or worker interests or state institutional dynamics alone. Rather, it appears that an alternative hypothesis for intervention trends is warranted which utilizes a synthetic application of both classic Marxist and Institutionalist variables.;Specifically, the explanatory value of the three following variables is probed: the "requirements of accumulation", the "balance of class mobilization" and the "cumulative institutional powers of the state". It is argued that while crises regarding the requirements of accumulation often--though not predominately--precipitate state interventions, they are just as often not served by those interventions. Moreover, while mobilizational stalemates between rail companies and workers as well as small shippers often force increases in state governance, the state increasingly comes to dominate the policy initiation and enactment process itself.;Finally, the cumulative powers of the state are seen to progressively change the causal problematic of state intervention such that it is possible to delineate six relatively distinct causal stages in the evolution of railroad intervention. That is, it does not seem possible to define a causal model for intervention in any ahistoric, generic sense. On the other hand, this investigation is taken as an indication of the necessity of developing theories of political economy which emphasize both a class struggle perspective and the possibility of a future "state mode of production".
机译:本文对1830年至1985年间英国和美国对铁路行业的主要国家干预措施进行了顺序矩阵分析。证据表明,国家主义的增量趋势不能仅仅解释为对资本主义或工人利益或国家制度的回应。仅动态。相反,似乎有必要对干预趋势进行另一种假设,该假设利用了经典的马克思主义和制度主义变量的综合应用。具体而言,探究了以下三个变量的解释价值:“积累的需求”,“平衡”。阶级动员”和“国家的累积机构权力”。有人认为,尽管关于积累要求的危机常常(尽管不是很普遍)促使国家干预,但这些干预却常常没有得到解决。此外,尽管铁路公司与工人以及小型托运人之间的动员僵局经常迫使国家治理增加,但国家越来越多地主导着政策启动和制定过程本身。最后,国家的累积权力被视为逐渐变化。国家干预的因果关系问题,因此有可能在铁路干预的发展过程中描绘出六个相对不同的因果阶段。也就是说,似乎不可能以任何历史的,一般的意义来定义干预的因果模型。另一方面,这项调查被视为表明发展政治经济学理论的必要性,该理论既强调阶级斗争观点,又强调未来“国家生产方式”的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    KENNEDY, ROBERT DAWSON, JR.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Public policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 475 p.
  • 总页数 475
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号