• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES IN STUDENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION.
【24h】

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES IN STUDENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION.

机译：高校学生人事部门目标管理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The primary purpose of the study is to compare and contrast the relationship between goal commitment and goal use in a system of management (Management by Objectives--MBO) in student service departments in higher education to other management systems which may or may not require the same formalized approach to goal setting and use. Institutional and personal characteristics of the participants are then analyzed to determine if they have any impact on goal use.;The chi-square statistic was used to analyze the relationship between the following: (1) goal use and goal commitment; (2) goal use, goal commitment and departmental identity; (3) goal use and goal commitment in MBO, management system similar to MBO, systems dissimilar to MBO and organizations with no prescribed system of management; (4) personal and organizational characteristics and goal use.;The pairwise "t" test and pairwise rank statistic were used to measure the degree to which goal use in specific management functional areas were used over others. Those management functional areas are: planning, personnel selection, training and development, coordinating, controlling, appraising, compensating and motivating.;Based on these analyses it was concluded that goal use does occur without goal commitment as defined by the author. Management systems that are designed to have high levels of goal commitment in fact had lower goal use than organizations with no prescribed systems of management. MBO and systems similar to it showed no significant relationship between goal use and goal commitment. In contrast there was a significant relationship between the two variables and organizations with no prescribed system of management. The author concludes that perhaps the maintenance process of goal oriented systems interferes with goal attainment.;Eighty-seven (87) institutions representing all geographical regions of the U.S. were each sent five questionnaires to be completed by directors of student service divisions. Sixty-two (62) institutions responded by returning one or more questionnaires. The questionnaire consisted of two parts: (1) an information sheet which solicited personal and institutional characteristics and (2) the Management Style Questionnaire (developed by Bruce Kirchhoff--1974) to measure goal use.;Individual and institutional characteristics appear to have no impact on goal commitment or goal use.;There were significant differences in goal use among the eight management areas. The previously mentioned eight management functional areas is the rank order, from the highest to lowest used, in which participants said they use goals.
机译：该研究的主要目的是将高等教育学生服务部门的管理系统（目标管理-MBO）中的目标承诺和目标使用之间的关系与可能需要或不需要的其他管理系统进行比较和对比。目标制定和使用的相同形式化方法。然后分析参与者的机构和个人特征，以确定他们是否对目标使用有任何影响。；卡方统计量用于分析以下各项之间的关系：（1）目标使用和目标承诺； （2）目标使用，目标承诺和部门认同； （3）MBO的目标使用和目标承诺，与MBO相似的管理系统，与MBO不同的系统以及没有规定管理体系的组织； （4）个人和组织的特征以及目标的使用。使用成对的“ t”检验和成对的等级统计来衡量特定管理职能领域中目标使用相对于其他领域的使用程度。这些管理功能领域是：计划，人员选拔，培训和发展，协调，控制，评估，补偿和激励。；基于这些分析，得出的结论是，使用目标的确没有作者定义的目标承诺。与没有规定管理系统的组织相比，旨在具有高度目标承诺的管理系统实际上具有较低的目标使用率。 MBO和类似的系统表明目标使用和目标承诺之间没有显着关系。相反，在没有规定管理系统的情况下，这两个变量与组织之间存在显着的关系。作者得出结论，也许面向目标的系统的维护过程会干扰目标的实现。;代表美国所有地理区域的八十七（87）家机构分别发送了五份问卷，由学生服务部门的主管填写。六十二（62）家机构通过返回一份或多份问卷进行了回应。问卷由两部分组成：（1）一份要求介绍个人和机构特征的信息表;（2）管理风格问卷（由Bruce Kirchhoff于1974年开发），用于衡量目标使用情况;个体和机构特征似乎没有对目标承诺或目标使用的影响；在八个管理领域中，目标使用存在显着差异。前面提到的八个管理功能区域是排名，从使用的最高到最低，参与者说他们使用目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    ANDREWS, ARCHIE.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 169 p.
  • 总页数 169
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号