• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >MAN'S ROLE, WOMAN'S PLACE: IMAGES OF WOMEN IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY.
【24h】

MAN'S ROLE, WOMAN'S PLACE: IMAGES OF WOMEN IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY.

机译：人的角色，女人的位置：人类地理中的女性形象。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent scholarship about women is raising new questions regarding gender roles and work as part of a larger investigation of androcentric or male-oriented studies. The division of labor between the sexes is a central issue in this debate.; The original motivation for this study was the observation that geographical works rarely account for the full scope and diversity of women's roles in society. Those few descriptions which have appeared are fragmentary and invariably limited to isolated categories such as women's productive roles in tribal society, in the development of agriculture, and in particular sectors of the political economy, especially textile manufacture. These fragments--more common in eighteenth and nineteenth century geographies--represent a failure to broadly define work and livelihood as methods by which societies extract resources from environments.; Erosion of geographical knowledge about women's diverse roles can be understood through analysis of two major, and partly contradictory, models of society: the ethnographic and economic. Structurally the ethnographic posits livelihood as interdependence between the sexes; the economic, male dominance and female dependence. Both views reflect prevailing social ideas but are influenced by the focus of study, whether non-Western or Western society. Both also incorporate, at different levels, an analogy of female to nature and male to culture. In the ethnographic view, this analogy appears in nineteenth century dualistic images of innate sex difference. The female becomes portrayed as conservative and maternal, the male progressive and intellectual. In the economic perspective, this analogy emerges structurally as male centrism in the definition of productive domains, and inclusion of women only as they appear in that framework.; Historically the ethnographic model typifies description of prehistorical and subsistence societies, the economic characterizes analysis of industrial ones. Since 1920, however, a basic economic assumption--the idea that men support women--has been extended into assessments of subsistence cultures with a resulting decline in knowledge about women's productive work and rise in theories projecting a universal division of labor between the sexes.
机译：最近对女性的奖学金正在提出有关性别角色和工作的新问题，这是对雄性中心或男性研究的更大调查的一部分。男女之间的分工是这场辩论的中心问题。这项研究的最初动机是观察到地理工作很少能说明妇女在社会中的作用的范围和多样性。很少出现的描述是零散的，并且总是局限于孤立的类别，例如妇女在部落社会，农业发展中，特别是在政治经济领域，尤其是纺织制造业中的生产性作用。这些碎片-在18世纪和19世纪的地理环境中更为普遍-代表着未能将工作和生计广泛定义为社会从环境中提取资源的方法。通过分析两种主要的，部分自相矛盾的社会模式：人种学和经济，可以了解有关妇女担任不同角色的地理知识的侵蚀。从结构上讲，民族志认为生活是两性之间的相互依存。经济，男性优势和女性依赖性。两种观点都反映了流行的社会观念，但受到研究重点的影响，无论是非西方社会还是西方社会。两者都在不同层次上将女性比作自然，将男性比作文化。在人种志学看来，这种类比出现在19世纪先天性别差异的二元图像中。女性被描绘成保守和孕产，男性被描绘成先进和知识分子。从经济学的角度来看，这种类比在结构上表现为在生产领域的定义中是男性中心主义，并且仅在出现在该框架内时才包括女性。在历史上，人种学模型代表了对史前社会和生存社会的描述，而经济则代表了对工业社会的分析。但是，自1920年以来，一个基本的经济假设（即男人支持妇女的观念）已扩展到对生存文化的评估中，从而导致对妇女生产性工作的了解减少，而预测两性之间普遍分工的理论增多。

著录项

  • 作者

    MARBURG, SANDRA LIN.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Geography.; History United States.; Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 448 p.
  • 总页数 448
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然地理学;美洲史;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号